LHC basics: What we can learn from lead-ion collisions

November 12, 2010 | 10:22 am

A lead-ion collision recorded by the ALICE experiment. This was a high-multiplicity collision that produced thousands of particles, including muons recorded in the forward muon spectrometer on the left.

A lead-ion collision recorded by the ALICE experiment. This was a high-multiplicity collision that produced thousands of particles, including muons recorded in the forward muon spectrometer (left). © CERN for the benefit of the ALICE collaboration.

The LHC has been smashing lead ions since Sunday, and physicists from the ALICE, ATLAS and CMS experiments are working around the clock to analyze the aftermath of these heavy-ion collisions at record energies and temperatures.* Last week we walked you through the process of creating, accelerating and colliding lead ions. Now we’ll talk about the big question: Why spend one month each year colliding heavy ions in the LHC?

The building blocks and mini ‘big bangs’

To understand why physicists around the world study heavy-ion collisions, we need to review some basic particle physics and discuss what happens when two nuclei collide at ultra-high energies.

First, the basics. Everything you see around you is composed of atoms, which are themselves composed of protons and neutrons bound together in an atomic nucleus, surrounded by a cloud of electrons. Electrons are one of the basic building blocks of matter, but protons and neutrons are not—they are in turn composed of elementary particles called quarks.

The strong force binds quarks inside composite particles, such as protons, via other elementary particles called gluons. Thus lead nuclei, which are made up of protons and neutrons, are really composed of many quarks and gluons.

When two lead nuclei slam into each other at high enough energies, they form a fireball of hot, dense matter. The temperatures created in the fireball are so great that they ‘melt’ the protons and neutrons. The result is a state of matter called the quark gluon plasma, in which quarks and gluons roam freely. The QGP exists for only an instant before the fireball expands and cools to the point where quarks and gluons once again form composite particles.

The LHC is not the first accelerator to create QGP. CERN announced indirect evidence for the “new state of matter” in 2000, a result of experiments in the 1980s and 1990s at the Super Proton Synchrotron (now used as the injector for the LHC). Next up was Brookhaven National Laboratory’s Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. In 2005 scientists from the RHIC experiments tentatively claimed the creation of a QGP in collisions of gold nuclei. Physicists at the LHC are now studying collisions of lead nuclei—and the properties of the QGP that should be produced in those collisions—at energies more than 13 times higher than at RHIC.

From bang to being—why we care

Snapshot of two lead nuclei just after impact. Click on the image to view animations of lead-ion collisions at the LHC's design energy (twice the current LHC collision energy).

Snapshot of two lead nuclei just after impact. Click on the image to view animations of lead-ion collisions at the LHC's design energy (twice the current LHC collision energy). © CERN/Henning Weber.

Physicists believe that the universe was filled with QGP millionths of a second after the big bang, until it expanded and cooled enough for the very first composite particles to form. This process is mirrored at very small scales in heavy-ion collisions, allowing scientists to study in the laboratory one of the early stages of the universe’s evolution. By creating millions of QGPs over the next month, scientists will learn more about how the basic building blocks of matter—quarks and gluons—come together to form particles, which in turn form all the matter in the universe.

One specific area of interest for LHC physicists is confinement. It appears to be impossible to observe quarks and gluons in isolation. Outside the quark gluon plasma, they are always confined within composite particles. The exact mechanism that causes this confinement is unknown. Without confinement, none of the composite particles that make up the world around us exist. So pinning down aspects of this mechanism is critical to understanding how matter evolved into the form it has today.

QGP will also be used to study the mystery of mass. Physicists are eagerly hunting for the Higgs boson in proton collision data, but finding the Higgs would only explain how the elementary particles such as quarks get their masses.  Another unsolved puzzle is where most of the mass of a proton or neutron comes from. Protons and neutrons are made up of three quarks each, but adding up the masses of the three quarks only accounts for about 1 percent of the proton or neutron mass. Physicists hope to find clues to the missing 99 percent in the behavior of the QGP.

One step at a time

A lead-ion collision as recorded by the CMS detector at the LHC. <i>Image copyright CERN for the benefit of the CMS collaboration.</i>

A lead-ion collision as recorded by the CMS detector at the LHC. © CERN for the benefit of the CMS collaboration.

Even with higher-energy collisions and more sophisticated detectors than ever before, LHC scientists won’t solve all the mysteries of quark confinement or the proton’s missing mass. But with only five days’ worth of data collected, physicists in the ALICE, ATLAS and CMS experiments are already working feverishly to produce the first new QGP measurements that will improve our understanding of the strong force.

With the very first data, physicists will study the heavy-ion collision environment at the highest energies ever produced in the laboratory. Some of the very first measurements to be published from the ALICE, ATLAS and CMS experiments with lead-ion collision data will describe the number of particles produced in such collisions, which will confirm or rule out various theoretical predictions.

With a bit more data, scientists will measure the “flow” of the QGP. In 2005 the physics community was surprised by RHIC physicists’ announcement that the QGP created in gold-ion collisions behaved like a liquid rather than a gas. Scientists don’t yet know—but will very soon—whether the QGP created in these higher-energy lead-ion collisions will flow like a liquid or will act more like a gas.

With even more data, physicists will measure the behavior of certain types of particles as they travel through the QGP. Physicists at RHIC have shown that certain particles are suppressed as they move through the QGP, which shows that the plasma interacts very strongly with these particles. The higher energies at the LHC and the more sensitive particle detectors will allow a greater number and variety of particles to be measured.

The ALICE experiment published its first paper using proton collision data mere days after the first collisions in November 2009, so the first papers with measurements from the LHC’s lead-ion collisions should be popping up in physics journals very soon.

* A note about temperatures
If you’ve been reading the news reports on the first lead-ion collisions at CERN, you will have seen scientists and journalists claiming that LHC collisions will create temperatures anywhere from 100,000 to 1 million times hotter than in the center of the sun. Here’s an attempt to set the record straight.

  • Based on measurements made at previous accelerators, the temperature at which a quark gluon plasma is created is about 100,000 times hotter than the sun’s core temperature. Above this temperature quarks and gluons are no longer confined inside other particles. (The sun’s core temperature is about 20 million Kelvin, equal to about 36 million degrees Fahrenheit.)
  • At RHIC, physicists discovered that the temperature generated in the very first instant after two gold ions collide was up to 2.5 times higher than that necessary to create the quark-gluon plasma – about 250,000 times higher than the sun’s core temperature.
  • This month’s lead-ion collisions at the LHC will take place at energies more than 13 times higher than at RHIC. Physicists estimate that these collisions could create temperatures up to twice as high as at RHIC, thus about 500,000 times the sun’s core temperature. When the LHC eventually runs at design energy, the temperatures could rise even higher.

Katie Yurkewicz
Posted in LHC updates |
9 Comments »

9 Responses to “LHC basics: What we can learn from lead-ion collisions”

  1. Pierre Burnside Says:

    Why was lead selected; insted of gold or bismuth?
    What isotope of lead is used; old lead or new?
    What isotope products will be formed when the plasma cools?
    Will a mass and energy ballance be calculated?

  2. we may learn not only how possibly the big bang started the universe deriving our sun and our world, but we may learn how our sun and our world may end – and i don’t mean mini black holes, we may also learn a new language of physics aside from perhaps the more cumbersome one of “particle” physics -
    perhaps there will be new ways of talking about the same reality – understanding states of plasma and the various states of mattercumenergy i hope will be byproducts – view of an artphysicist only

  3. What keeps the detector from burning up at the temperatures mentioned in this article? It doesn’t seem possible that any material would be able to withstand these temperatures or that it would be possible to keep the equipment cool enough to protect it. Even though it begins cooling almost instantaneously, wouldn’t the detector have to withstand the initial heat?

  4. I am 61 years old. Do you feel like there will be any beneficial discoveries as a result of this line of experimentation within say, the next 20 years? Beneficial is a broad term I using to mean something that improves mankind in a specific or even general way. Personally, I could care less about the Big Bang unless it somehow improves the quality of my life. I would settle for 30 MPG. while driving my Chevy pickup to and from work. Yep, that would be a meaningful start. We spend a lot of time, talent and money on various lines of research. What good is such hard work if it takes longer than a generation to come to fruition? Or, it is so potentially strategically altering, that it is suppressed?
    Rs

  5. John McKinney Says:

    If you are over 60 and don’t notice the changes in quality of life that are due to transistors, microwaves, lasers, and computers I am at a loss of words. These technologies all have massive impact on our economy and quality of life and are all fairly recent technologies. The photo-electric effect being discovered by Albert Einstein in 1905 and the electronic digital computers in the late 1930′s and early 1940′s. Solid State transistors were just a lab curiosity in the late 1940′s. I think the need for a 30MPG car will be dwarfed by what might be made available with technologies based on today’s research.

  6. Har Sukhdeep Singh Says:

    Quest is as basic in animals as some other features. It is of very high order in humans more so in those whose bread butter and breath is quest.As a child I used to learn many things by breaking them. The most advanced tool ,LHC, does the same but in an extremely refined way.
    It is good to know but all knowledge need not be commercialised. I doubt whether this can be achieved unless the meaning of progress is changed for the betterment of all life. Otherwise situations much worse than Global Warming will make most of life extinct.

  7. John Jordan, if you’re going to choose a horribly inefficient vehicle for your drive to work that is your problem, not anyone else’s. There are plenty of much more efficient alternatives. Your problem was solved long ago.

    Whilst you’re stuck in the past with your poorly designed Chevvy engine, the rest of the human race has moved on. Granted, the LHC’s research is blue-skies, but then so many of the previous century’s most astounding breakthroughs came from just such research. I suggest you correct your blinkered and short-sighted viewpoint by reading up on the history of science in the last 100 years…

  8. George Garrett Says:

    As a 73 year old professor, I learn a new world every 10 years. Today, I teach in a classroom where information can be researched online and lead-on collisions projected onto a screen for class discussion. Instantly the class can discuss current research at Berkeley, Paris, Harvard, Cambridge, or Austin. Computers aren’t even close to what they were 20 years ago. Incidentally, modern cars are operated to a large extent by a computer. I can see a real-time happening in Tokyo or London. Aircraft can be flown from remote locations by camera with amazing accuracy. If I want to see where my daughter lives in Manhattan, I simply pull her apartment up on Google or Mapquest and have a look. Yes, it’s not the same world. By the way, the mysteries uncovered by the Hubble telescope which can look back in time toward the big bang is also fascinating.

  9. Sphere Coupler Says:

    Katie Yurkewicz;

    The SOHO site indicates a sun core temperature of 15.7K/28 million degrees F.
    Though lacking a cooler boundary to expand into, Do any collaboration teams expect convection currents to be set up above a certain threshold? Surely at higher energies magnetic torsion occurs before cool down takes over we would see tiny spicules and filaments…or might that take an additional medium to couple?

Leave a Reply