Making magnetic monopoles, and other exotica, in the lab
January 29, 2009 | 2:00 pm
Physicist Shou-Cheng Zhang has proposed a way to physically realize the magnetic monopole. In a paper published online in the January 29 issue of Science Express, Zhang and post-doctoral collaborator Xiao-Liang Qi predict the existence of a real-world material that acts as a magic mirror, in which the never-before-observed monopole appears as the image of an ordinary electron. If his prediction is confirmed by experiments, this could mean the opening of condensed matter as a new venue for observing the exotica of high-energy physics.
Zhang is a condensed-matter theorist at the Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Science (SIMES), a joint institute of SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University. He studies solids that exhibit unusual electromagnetic and quantum behaviors, with an eye towards their use in information storage. But due to his training as a particle physicist, Zhang always keeps the big picture in mind. That’s why it was so easy for him to see that the material he was already working on could behave like what theorists call a magnetic monopole, an isolated north or south magnetic pole.
The monopole is thought of as electric charge’s magnetic cousin, but unlike positive or negative charges, north or south poles always occur together in what’s called a dipole. A lone north or south pole simply doesn’t show up in the real world. Even if you take a bar magnet and cut it in half down the middle, you won’t get a separate north and south pole, but two new dipole magnets instead. For symmetry-minded theorists, however, it’s natural that there should be a magnetic equivalent of charge. String theories and grand unified theories rely on its existence, and its absence undermines the mathematical feng-shui of the otherwise elegant Maxwell’s equations that govern the behavior of electricity and magnetism. What’s more, the existence of a magnetic monopole would explain another mystery of physics: why charge is quantized; that is, why it only seems to come in tidy packets of about 1.602×10–19 coulombs, the charge of an electron or proton.
For decades, scientists have kept their eyes peeled for the elusive monopole, but perhaps they were looking in the wrong place. “They were literally hoping it would fall from sky,” Zhang says. The notion isn’t as far-fetched as it seems—our world is constantly bombarded by weird particles showering from far-off cosmic events, and magnetic monopoles could very well show up as part of that rain. Some enterprising physicists installed loops of superconducting material on their rooftops. If anything remotely like a magnetic monopole fell through, the loops, being sensitive to magnetic fluctuations, would register it.
But in more than 30 years of searching, no one’s been able to conclusively detect this particle. Accelerator experiments have been no more successful, leading scientists believe existing monopoles must be far too heavy to create in even the Large Hadron Collider.
Interestingly, Zhang’s magnetic monopole didn’t fall from the heavens; instead, it was leading a quiet life on the other side of a mirror, but a mirror made of a very special type of alloy. What’s more, says Zhang, the math to prove the effect is very clear. “You could give the last part of the mathematical derivation as a final exam in a junior or senior year undergraduate physics class.”
To understand how a material can act like a magnetic monopole, it helps to examine first how an ordinary metal acts when a charge—an electron, say—is brought close to the surface. Because like charges repel, the electrons at the surface retreat to the interior, leaving the previously neutral surface positively charged. The resulting electric field looks exactly like that of a particle with positive charge the same distance below the surface—it’s the positive mirror image of the electron. In fact, from an observer’s point of view, it’s impossible to tell the difference.
The concept of an image charge is something undergraduate physics students encounter in their very first electricity and magnetism class, along with the idea that the magnetic monopole doesn’t exist. But Zhang’s “mirror” alloy is no ordinary material. It’s what’s called a topological insulator, a strange breed of solid Zhang specializes in, in which “the laws of electrodynamics are dramatically altered,” he says. In fact, if an electron was brought close to the surface of a topological insulator, Zhang’s paper demonstrates, something truly eerie would happen. Instead of an ordinary positive charge, Zhang says, “You would get what looks like a magnetic monopole in the ‘mirror.’”
To go back to the example of image charges, it’s important to emphasize that there isn’t actually half of a bar magnet somewhere inside this material. Instead, Zhang discovered, due to a peculiarity of the material called strong spin-orbit coupling, the nearby electron would induce a current in the surface that circulates constantly without dying out. This in turn—undergraduate physics majors, get out your pencils—would create a magnetic field that looks like that of a magnetic monopole. Experimentalists have tried to approximate this field before, for instance by arranging permanent magnets in certain ways. But to an outside observer, Zhang’s material would be completely indistinguishable from the monopole particle that physicists were hoping to catch in their superconducting detectors.
“We like to find things that don’t exist,” says Zhang. His work on the monopole has further ramifications; this could be a way to physically realize a number of particles that, until now, have only existed as mathematical loopholes in high-energy physics theories. For instance, Zhang has shown that the electron and image monopole together would act like a so-called “anyon” located at the solid’s surface. “The ‘any,’ in this case, is as in ‘anything,’” Zhang explains—they are particles that only exist in two dimensions, whose properties straddle those of the two classes of three-dimensional particles, fermions and bosons.
Although Zhang works as a theorist, he has close ties to experimental physics. In 2007, his prediction of the quantum spin Hall effect in mercury telluride was confirmed experimentally, earning his work praise in Science as a runner-up breakthrough of that year. “As a theorist you’re always motivated by the math, but it’s a testament to our understanding that we can predict real-world materials,” Zhang says. “Before, new materials were more or less found by accident.” Now other SIMES researchers will be using the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource at SLAC to closely study two specific materials, bismuth selenide and bismuth telluride, that Zhang has predicted will exhibit this strange mirror behavior. They hope to confirm the prediction experimentally some time this year.
“Exotic particles such as the magnetic monopole, dyon, anyon, and the axion have played fundamental roles in our theoretical understanding of quantum physics,” Zhang writes in the paper. “Experimental observation of these exotic particles in table-top condensed matter systems could finally reveal their deep mysteries.” Topological insulators could provide a new experimental outlet for high-energy physicists. “You don’t have to look towards the cosmos,” Zhang says. “I think we’ll see more of the beautiful mathematical structures of high-energy physics become realized in condensed matter physics.”
By Lauren Schenkman, symmetry intern
Update: You can hear some discussion of this on the fun This Week in Science podcast.
Guest author
Posted in Uncategorized |
11 Comments »




January 30th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
What happens if you build a sphere of this mirror material and expose it to an electric charge? Would the entire surface reflect a magnetic monopole…or can it not be surrounded with an electric charge because the inside of a charged object is neutral?
January 30th, 2009 at 4:38 pm
[...] Magnetic Monopoles? January 30, 2009 Posted by taoist in Cool Stuff, Science and Technology. trackback Courtesy of interesting new materials? [...]
January 30th, 2009 at 5:20 pm
The Gundams are coming…….>_>
Aren’t they 300 years early though…?
January 31st, 2009 at 11:01 am
Don’t make such joking statements. This is a serious subject, not something for toys and children’s cartoons like the Gundams.
There might be a similar concept in those cartoons but jumping to conclusions like that isn’t very mature.
January 31st, 2009 at 11:30 am
and you are the mature one?
January 31st, 2009 at 11:55 am
If I remember correctly, there is a discussion in the Feynmann lectures showing that a magmonopole would violate conservation laws.
(might have been in lecture, and not the book though)
Any thoughts?
January 31st, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Holy cow ArthurH. You seem a little too serious.
If we can’t have fun and make jokes, what’s it all for?
February 2nd, 2009 at 3:37 am
How does this “magnetic monopole” effect differ from the diamagnetism bismuth is known to exhibit?
February 3rd, 2009 at 3:03 pm
ArthurH // Star Wars is for kiddies too. lol
February 4th, 2009 at 1:34 am
Adam.Selene/ the Fenyman series indeed postulates existence of monopoles would require violation. . . O.K. I pulled out my Fermi Series, Sorry–Check into the discussion along the weak anthropic viz. equivalence discussion of a force from nothing a inertial anistropy within the structure of the universe. The Cassimer affect if you recall, and the energy argument from field theories. Two planer-parallel mirrors. Here, attention should present electron dynamics in superlattice.
April 15th, 2009 at 2:52 pm
Magnetic monopoles have not been found because the search has been in the wrong dimension. Electrical charges can be separated by space to expose the electrical field between them as long as they are at the same time and for us is now. Magnetic monopoles (charges) can be separated by time (past and future) to expose the magnetic field between them as long as they are at the same space and for us is a singularity. When a charge changes its location in space it involves space/time. Since we only observe the now and we don’t notice that the magnetic monopoles have become separated in time and we only observe the magnetic field that is exposed. When a magnetic monopole moves in time from past to future or future to past depending on the “polarity” of the monopole it involves space/time. We observe the exposed electrical charge in a location in space (negative or positive depending upon the direction of movement in time of the monopole) but not the movement in time of the monopole.