In the two decades since its formal inception, the particle physics experiment known as BaBar has gone far beyond its original scientific goal: studying charge-parity violation, which is one method the universe uses to play favorites by showing a preference for matter over antimatter.
But the agenda of BaBar’s 20th anniversary collaboration meeting in Frascati, Italy, last December did not consist of three days of researchers patting themselves on the back. They were too busy preparing further data analyses and future proposals.
BaBar Spokesman Michael Roney, a particle physics professor from the University of Victoria, says that the hundreds of scientists who have belonged to the international collaboration have published more than 500 scientific papers in the past two decades, discussing everything from newly discovered types of mesons (a particle made of a quark and an antiquark) to coming to grips with Big Data before it even had a name.
The one thing they haven’t done is combine their data with data from their competition, Belle, a Japanese experiment that ran at the same time and also provided valuable data about charge-parity violation.
The term competition is a little strong, says Roney: Having two different experiments pursue the same goal is a vital part of the scientific process. “Originally, it was important for Belle and BaBar to maintain their independence from each other so each experiment could serve as a check on the other,” he says. “But there are certain issues where neither experiment has enough data to make a definitive statement.”
To solve that problem, Markus Röhrken, a post-graduate researcher at the California Institute of Technology and a relatively new BaBarian, will bring the Belle and BaBar datasets together for the first time. He’s on a hunt for aspects of charge-parity violation that could yield totally new physics beyond the Standard Model.
Combining the data is more complicated than it sounds. “The physics behind BaBar and Belle is exactly the same,” Röhrken says, “but the detectors, the software, the experiments themselves are very different.” Röhrken must become expert in both experiments; while he was a graduate student at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology in Germany, his PhD work was done on Belle, so he’s already halfway there.
“It’s very unusual for two different collaborations to combine the data itself for analyses,” Roney says. “It’s much more common to combine published results.”
But Röhrken has his own motivations for pursuing this. Japan is planning a follow-up to Belle, Belle 2, but it isn’t scheduled to start taking data until 2016 at the earliest.
“I didn’t want to just wait for four or five years to work on these questions,” he says. “I want to look for new physics.”