A joint Fermilab/SLAC publication
Illustration by Sandbox Studio, Chicago

Letter to the editor: Oldest light?

04/16/14

Reader Bill Principe raises an interesting question about the headline of a recent symmetry article.

Dear symmetry,

I am not a physicist, so forgive me if I get my physics wrong.

The most recent issue has an article called “The oldest light in the universe.”

But I thought that Einstein’s [Special] Theory of Relativity says that, as an object moves faster and faster, time slows relative to everything else. If that is true, doesn’t that mean that time has stopped for light, traveling at the speed of light?

In other words, for all photons, has not time stopped? For photons, is it not, right now, the time of the big bang? If so, there is no such thing as the oldest light in the universe. All light is 13.8 billion years old, and all light is brand new.

I understand the point of the article. It is the information that the light carries that is old, so I am essentially mincing words. But I think my observation might make a fun counterpoint.

 

Bill Principe

Ayer, Massachusetts

 

Editor’s note: The reader is correct! According to theorist Lance Dixon at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory: If a clock could somehow travel with a photon at the speed of light, it would show that no time had elapsed during the photon's journey.

 

Like what you see? Sign up for a free subscription to symmetry!

Latest news articles

02/08/16
The Conversation

Particle accelerators help push theoretical physics, but they've also had more impact on your everyday life than you realize.

02/01/16
Berkeley Lab

Scientists create the first-ever 2-stage laser-plasma accelerator powered by independent laser pulses.

01/31/16
The Guardian

I’d never heard of it before this week, but it’s real. And there are plans to use it to look for antigravity.

01/23/16
Wired

Researchers hope that their work will open up a new way to unify quantum theory with Einstein’s general theory of relativity.