Power outage shows strength of Tevatron team

November 11, 2008 | 10:03 am

When most of Fermilab went dark Wednesday, non-essential support staff went home, but many engineers, technicians, and physicists picked up flashlights and buckled down for work.

Instead of their normal jobs–running the cutting-edge machinery in an international race to discovery–the men and women were switching to the role of a high-tech pit crew: inspecting and returning to life the highest-energy particle accelerator currently operating.

At 2:30 p.m. Wednesday, a power arc at a power line on site had brought Fermilab’s accelerator complex and its key component the Tevatron–a 4-mile particle raceway–to a standstill. Two nearly 6000-ton particle detectors reading data from an average of 2.5 million proton-antiproton collisions per second ground to a halt as the engine powering bunches of particles racing toward them silenced.

The outage wasn’t a monumental problem. Outages of up to a few seconds occur several times a year. Outages of up to 10 minutes occur occasionally. They cause little concern because the temperature of the superconducting magnets in the Tevatron particle collider rises slowly.

But an outage of an hour, which occurs only once every one or two years, creates some challenges. Such outages push the system past a temperature threshold that usually requires a day or two of downtime. It’s a speed bump, but it’s also a chance to test how well the divisions of the laboratory work together.

First steps to recovery

Fermilab employees took on their repair roles like a well-oiled machine.

“When the lights went out,” said Bob Mau, head of Accelerator Division Operations, “within minutes, 40 people from all divisions were in the Control Room to find out what was going on and talking about what to do.”

The Accelerator Division’s Controls Department shut down non-essential equipment to conserve backup power, to avoid overheating the now non-air conditioned rooms and to keep key control room systems operating after the power outage.

In the event of an outage, the beams racing through the accelerator complex are aborted to prevent damage to accelerator components.

The helium refrigeration system that cools the magnets to make their coils superconducting shuts down. The helium in the magnet’s cryogenic system warms and some of it escapes as it turns from liquid to gas.

Getting a giant race back on track

To restore lab-wide electricity, Fermilab crews rerouted power from the downed main power station on site to the Kautz Road substation within an hour of the power outage. But that didn’t mean the Tevatron could be turned back on as easily as flipping a light switch.

First, operating systems for the United States’ last large atom smasher have to come back online: computers for use by the control room and cryogenics team, the cryogenic system, the vacuum system, the water must be restored. Then the beam can be turned back on. Beam returned to the neutrino experiments, the test beam area, and neutron therapy by Monday. The Tevatron could return to operation along with the CDF and DZero detectors as early as this evening.

“We have got a lot of dedicated people working a lot of hours right now,” Accelerator Division head Roger Dixon, told a standing-room only crowd of supervisors, technicians, and physicists working to coordinate efforts. “I know they are willing to work until the job is done but it is more important to not to let them work beyond their limits. Getting the job done safely is more important than getting the machine up early.”

What happened?

An anchor-shaped bracket connects the electric lines to the pi-shaped power poles north of Wilson Hall. A metal pin on one of the brackets became loose, causing a static line that serves as a lightening rod to fall and hit the insulator and power lines. The ensuing arc of electricity triggered a shut down of the master power station.  Power to everywhere except the Village and Main Injector vanished.

Crews from Fermilab, Commonwealth Edison, and the city of Batavia, which maintains the lines, inspected all the poles Wednesday night, finding two other loose pins. Experts say the wind combined with either a faulty spring, oversized pinhole, or improper installation likely caused the failures.

“It was like a football game by the poles Wednesday,” said site engineer Prem Mattappally about the large number of bucket and lighting trucks and inspectors. ComEd used a helicopter to further inspect the area Thursday morning.

As soon as power to the site was stabilized, operations people from several divisions and sections huddled together to report on their respective tire kicking of their parts of the laboratory’s machinery. People were assigned repair jobs. Shifts were set up to allow everyone a chance to get into the cramped tunnels and detector halls to tinker under the hoods of the complex systems.

Some items were damaged, but so far, everything has been easily fixable with spare parts on site. Extended outages always cause some damage and the laboratory plans for that.

Sixty percent of the helium inventory was lost but enough remained to refill the Tevatron for operation before reordering more. A water pipe split, a couple leaks formed, a couple computer hard drives were lost, and a turbine sustained damage–all anticipated occurrences.

Rather than waiting for ComEd to finish repairs to the master power station Friday morning, the DZero and CDF collaborations used stored program runs Wednesday to test their detectors’ parts and slowly applied power to sections of their detectors to make sure they could withstand a full startup scheduled for Monday. The MiniBooNE neutrino experiment performed similar checks. So far, there appears to be no damage.

By Thursday morning, the Booster accelerator had cooling water circulating and the ion pumps were back on. The collider detectors were under inspection, and the chiller was restarted for the NuMI target hall.

At the Tevatron, kicker magnets and beam separators were being conditioned, the vacuum system restored and back ups for the computer systems recharged.

Friday started the complicated process of slowly cooling down the Tevatron to minus 450 degrees Fahrenheit—close to absolute zero. It typically takes a minimum of 24 to 48 hours to purify the helium system and then restore the cryogenic system.

Like a fine-tuned race car engine, you can’t just throw the throttle on the Tevatron without warming it up, or in this case cooling it down, but with patience, skill, and dedicated employees you can get even town-sized raceways and three-story particle detectors humming again.

Tona Kunz

1 Comment »

3-D printer puts detector at your fingertips

November 10, 2008 | 5:12 pm

Norman Graf (left) and Marco Oriunno with their model and CAD drawing (background). (Photo by Calla Cofield.)

Norman Graf (left) and Marco Oriunno with their model and CAD drawing (background). (Photo by Calla Cofield.)

Blueprints decorate the desk top and design printouts cover the walls of SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory physicist Marco Oriunno’s office. They all display plans for a potential particle detector for the International Linear Collider. But to show off the detector, Oriunno goes straight for a pile of colorful plastic. He and SLAC’s Norman Graf stack the pieces together like oversized Legos and voilà! A 3-D version of the detector that can be displayed to scientists, engineers and other project members to help them better understand the massive detector they are trying to build.

Graf and Oriunno are planning the detector as members of the international Silicon Detector Design Collaboration. While design software allows Oriunni and Graf to map out the detector before it is built, Graf says the 3-D model reveals its physical structure in a way that can’t be achieved with software images alone. “It’s another learning tool. To have both the fully developed design in CAD [computer aided design] and the 3-D model makes a good convergence.”

The "printed" 3-D model of the ILC silicon detector. (Photo by Calla Cofield.)

The "printed" 3-D model of the ILC silicon detector. (Photo by Calla Cofield.)

Eight baseball-sized blue trapezoids (painted by Graf and Oriunno) represent a section of the detector used for muon identification, the barrel magnetic flux return. In the real detector, these trapezoids will weigh 400 metric tons each. A magnetic coil (silver) encloses further, central detection equipment, including the 12-sided hadronic calorimeter (purple), the electromagnetic calorimeter (not visible) and the tracking detectors (red).

The model answers questions for engineers about how to assemble the real thing. Graf and Oriunno explain that their detector could possibly share the beam with a second, so they need to make it mobile. The model may help engineers find a way of moving the detector without taking it apart.

The 3-D printer cost SLAC nearly $30,000, but it seems to be earning its keep quickly. For a machinist to create the model by hand would cost at least a few thousand dollars, Oriunno says. The printer produced the 3-D model for just a few hundred dollars. Instead of paying a machinist for every hour it takes to produce the model, the printer only requires manpower for setup and entry of commands. Then the machine runs by itself day and night, taking about one month to produce all the pieces for the detector model.

Graf and Oriunno say the printer is useful for generating rapid prototypes, and making new models if plans change or errors are detected. The two scientists say they will continue to use the printer to make 3-D models of smaller parts of the detector. Depending on the size and number of jobs in the queue, the printer runs non-stop for months, or remains available for immediate use.

This story first appeared in SLAC Today.

Calla Cofield

No Comments »

LHC a best invention of 2008

November 7, 2008 | 2:25 pm

What’s better than a bionic hand, but not quite as good as an electric sports car? The Large Hadron Collider, according to TIME Magazine. This month the magazine awarded the LHC fifth place in its annual list of the top 50 inventions of the year.

The top invention of 2008 was a retail DNA test that makes personal genotyping available to anyone who can afford the $399 price. Rounding out the top five were a $100,000 electric sports car, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter set to launch in February 2009, and an online hub for network TV shows and movies.

Less highly-ranked, but still notable for physics fans were the Roadrunner supercomputer at Los Alamos National Laboratory (#10); a memristor, a new kind of circuit that remembers its history even when turned off (#13); and an eco-friendly refrigerator design patented by Albert Einstein and a collaborator in 1930 (#31). And notable no matter what you’re a fan of: smog-busting cement and a moving skyscraper.

Of the LHC, TIME makes no excuses for naming it a best invention despite the recent setbacks, noting:

The mammoth machine will send protons wheeling in opposite directions at nearly the speed of light, then smash them together at 6,000 times a second to try to answer such deep questions as why mass exists and whether the universe has extra dimensions. If it takes a few extra months to find out, so what?

You can read about or watch the best inventions at TIME Magazine.

Katie Yurkewicz

No Comments »

Fun aunt gives children a taste of cutting-edge physics

November 6, 2008 | 7:49 am

Documentary. Particle physics. The terms normally don’t denote excitement to a group of 12-year-olds.

But a group of Illinois preteens decided to take a gamble and not doubt the aunt they dubbed “the fun aunt” when she proposed at trip to watch the documentary The Atom Smashers as an outing.

Smart move, kids.

To her own surprise, Emily Demar retained her title and got her nieces and nephews hooked on science when they watched and loved the film about the race to find the Higgs boson between Fermilab in Illinois and the European particle physics lab CERN. In a column she writes for a local newspaper, Demar described the experience, and why you too should expose children to science.

One niece noted the familiar faces in the film had been sitting among us in the audience. She regretted not taking the opportunity to get their autographs. Clearly grasping the competitive nature in the film, they argued among themselves about the importance of Fermilab being first to discover the Higgs Boson. The pièce de résistance came when my 12-year old nephew proceeded to draw out on a convenient napkin his ideas for discovering Higgs.

Demar said one of the things about the film was not its discussion of current scientific endeavors in easy-to-understand terms, but the fact that it dispelled stereotypes about physics as dorky and inaccessible.

It puts to rest the fallacy that scientists reside in a different dimension, portraying them as regular Joe’s like you and me. In the end, the documentary turns into compelling human drama, with fame, glory and maybe even a Nobel Prize hanging in the balance.

See for yourself when the documentary airs on PBS’s Independent Lens Nov. 25.

Tona Kunz

1 Comment »

Still three physicists in Congress

November 5, 2008 | 5:48 pm

After yesterday’s US elections, all three sitting physicists remain in Congress.

The three Congressmen are: Representative Vern Ehlers, Michigan; Representative Bill Foster, Illinois; and Representative Rush Holt, New Jersey.

The most recent to enter Congress was Bill Foster, ex-Fermilab physicist, who won his seat earlier in 2008 in a special election called after House of Representatives Speaker Dennis Hastert stepped down.

David Harris

2 Comments »

Should a photon-photon collider precede the ILC?

November 5, 2008 | 7:54 am

Should the International Linear Collider (ILC) be the next big project for high energy physics? Or should a smaller, less expensive collider be the next step? Former director of Japan’s KEK laboratory and former International Committee on Future Accelerators chairperson Hirotaka Sugawara proposes that the HEP community build a photon-photon collider prior to building the ILC. When asked “Why the rush?” he replied, “Why should we wait?”

Two major factors could answer Sugawara’s question. First, whether the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN successfully detects the Higgs boson in a low-energy range and, second, whether or not international support for the ILC falls short of the six billion dollar price tag.

The concept of a photon collider has been explored by physicists for about a few decades now, with possible implementations considered for a variety of accelerator facilities, but most recently for the ILC. A photon collider was being thought of as an upgrade of rather than a precursor to the ILC, capable of exploring a range of physics in complementary ways to either electron-positron or proton-proton collisions, the two avenues pursued by the ILC and LHC. Sugawara wants to reverse that order and build a photon-photon collider first.

A photon-photon collider might tempt physicists eager to study the Higgs boson. If the Higgs has a mass in the low-energy range as most theories predict, then a photon-photon collider could generate Higgs bosons directly, requiring only 160 GeV of energy. A photon-photon collider has often been referred to as a Higgs factory due to its potential to produce copious quantities of Higgs particles and study them in detail.

The lower energy requirement doesn’t make the physics any easier, but it would be a less expensive alternative. Matter colliders like the LHC and the ILC can only produce a Higgs in conjunction with a Z boson, which requires an extra 100 GeV in energy. That extra energy shows up on the electric bill and can mean a difference of millions of dollars in operating costs.

Sugawara emphasizes that cost is the primary motivating factor for building a photon-photon collider first. The ILC can’t materialize unless organizers can get governments and funding agencies to support it. With high-energy physics suffering budget cuts world wide, and the LHC still trying to get on its feet, it’s a tough time to pitch such an idea. Sugawara predicts that the cost of a photon-photon collider would be well under half that of the ILC, making it more appealing to potential funders.

“If there is a financial threshold over which a government will not fund the ILC, and if that threshold is half the cost, then a photon-photon collider might make sense,” says Tor Raubenheimer, head of the Accelerator Physics Group at SLAC. But if governments are willing to fully fund the ILC, Raubenheimer says it is unlikely that the community will hold back from building it. Sugawara supports building one either way.

Then again, Sugawara argues that a photon-photon collider could also advance accelerator technology before the ILC is built. “From the time that it is decided to build a particle accelerator to the time the physics actually starts can easily be a decade,” Raubenheimer says. Right now the ILC would operate at 500 GeV, but by the time it is fully constructed scientists may well want it to operate at 1 or 2 TeV. Such an upgrade might not be fiscally or technologically possible on a fully constructed machine. As Sugawara puts it, “We would build the machine to study the machine.” In other words he believes the potential collider would advance accelerator technology and understanding before a major investment is made in the ILC.

Of course, it may not come down to people at all. Results from the LHC might change everything. If the Higgs is not in the low-energy range, a photon-photon collider wouldn’t be able to find it. However, Sugawara still believes the machine could be beneficial, and that plans should be made in the next 3-5 years to build one. With planning overlap he says the ILC could still come online in less than 15 years.

“My view is the minority,” Sugawara says. “I think we should just build it. People think from the beginning it should have some big discovery. My view is different. I think we should build it to see what direction we should go in.”

Raubenhimer says, “If the LHC comes back with a low mass Higgs and low mass supersymmetry–some really exciting results–I think that will motivate the [ILC] committee to get together and make the ILC happen.” If the LHC doesn’t provide such thrilling results, it may push back the ILC timeline.

Sugawara, who now lives and works in Washington, DC, says he needs a global consensus in the physics community to make a photon-photon collider happen. Slowly but steadily, through presentations all over Europe and the United States, he is trying to build that consensus. He brought his presentation to the ILC Steering Committee, in charge of promoting the construction of the ILC through international collaboration, on October 31.

 

Read the technical details (PDF) of one photon-photon collider design in a document prepared when the TESLA project was a contending design for the International Linear Collider.

Calla Cofield

3 Comments »

Open SESAME

November 4, 2008 | 10:00 am

Mr. Salameh, Mayor of Salt City, Jordan, and Herman Winick. Salt is the largest city near the SESAME site in the town of Allan Jordan. They are standing at the BESSY I 0.8 GeV booster synchrotron which is being assembled in the new SESAME facility building.

Mr. Salameh, Mayor of Salt City, Jordan, and Herman Winick. Salt is the largest city near the SESAME site in the town of Allan Jordan. They are standing at the BESSY I 0.8 GeV booster synchrotron which is being assembled in the new SESAME facility building.

One might imagine that not many celebratory events bring together high-ranking representatives from the Palestinian Authority, Israel, Turkey, and Greek Cyprus, given current diplomatic relations. But a synchrotron science soirée this week has done just that.

Yesterday marked the inauguration of the UNESCO-sponsored project Synchrotron Light for Experimental Science and Applications in the Middle East, or SESAME. The event celebrated the beginning of the lightsource’s injection system installation and the completion of the center’s main building, which is occupied by about 20 staff members. The SESAME site and building have been provided by Jordan; the project as a whole is a collaboration between Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Pakistan, Palestinian Authority, and Turkey.

“I am often asked why countries that have no diplomatic relations, and even engage in hostile acts against each other, are cooperating to make SESAME a reality,” said SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University physicist Herman Winick, who first proposed the project. “It is because they seek the benefits that SESAME offers. Their students no longer have to leave the region to conduct frontier research as part of graduate training. Their scientific diaspora has reason to return. And their scientists can pursue studies relevant to local biomedical and environmental issues and concerns. SESAME also promotes understanding among scientists from different cultures and religions, contributing to peace in the region.”

The idea of an international synchrotron lightsource in the Middle East was first proposed in September 1997 by Winick and followed up a few months later by Gustaf-Adolf Voss of the German laboratory DESY during a workshop organized by the CERN-based Middle East Scientific Cooperation group. The project was officially launched at a meeting at UNESCO headquarters in 1999, and construction began in 2003. 

Just after yesterday’s inauguration ceremony, the SESAME council presidency passed from Herwig Schopper, former director-general of CERN, to Sir Chris Llewellyn-Smith, also a former director-general of CERN.  

The facility, located about 19 miles northwest of Amman, Jordan, will accelerate electrons in a circle to produce high-intensity light called synchrotron radiation over a broad energy range extending from the infra-red to hard X-rays. This light will enable scientists to view molecules that are too small to see with regular visible-light microscopes, allowing for research in physical science, biological and medical sciences, environmental sciences, industrial applications, and archaeology.

SESAME is built around the BESSY I accelerator, which was decommissioned at the German research institution BESSY at the end of 1999 and subsequently donated to the SESAME project. The BESSY I 0.8 GeV injection system, worth about US$6 million, is now being installed as components are procured for an entirely new 2.5 GeV third-generation storage ring at SESAME, comparable to SLAC’s SPEAR3.

Entire beamlines have been donated by the Daresbury Synchrotron Radiation Source in the United Kingdom, the Laboratoire pour l’Utilisation du Rayonnement Electromagnetique in France, and the Swiss Light Source in Switzerland. In addition, the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory’s Advanced Light Source loaned the project a permanent magnet wiggler, and SLAC loaned a permanent magnet undulator and an X-ray monochromator.

“Thanks to the help of many laboratories and countries, SESAME is on track to begin operations in 2011,” Winick said.

Read more about the origins of SESAME in symmetry.

This story also appeared in SLAC Today.

Kelen Tuttle

1 Comment »

South Pole Summer season starts

November 3, 2008 | 9:30 am

The first plane of the season arrives Monday, Oct. 27, 2008, at the IceCube research site. The experiment detects neutrinos at the South Pole, where winter recently came to a close. Photo by Heidi Lim.

The first plane of the season arrives Monday, Oct. 27, at the National Science Foundation's Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station, where winter just came to a close. The South Pole Station is the site of the IceCube experiment, which detects high-energy neutrinos. Photo by Heidi Lim.

IceCube is a vast neutrino detection experiment that uses Antarctic ice as part of the detector. Read more about it in a feature in symmetry, and get more information here.

David Harris

No Comments »

Dead 53 years, Albert Einstein still rakes in the dough

October 31, 2008 | 4:25 pm

Parody by Sandbox Studio

Parody by Sandbox Studio

Just in time for Halloween, Forbes has released its annual list of top-earning dead celebrities. There in fourth place–behind Elvis Presley, cartoonist Charles Schulz, and actor Heath Ledger–is Albert Einstein, whose frowsy-haired image earned an estimated $18 million in royalties this year. In 2006, symmetry reported that Einstein was in third place.

Einstein–aguably the most widely recognized and most beloved scientist of modern times–is actually a staple of the list. (The UK’s Guardian news blog playfully referrs to “Albert Einstein’s Theory of Royalty Longevity.”) He earned more this year than each of Marilyn Monroe, Dr. Seuss, Paul Newman, and John Lennon.

Says Forbes:

Albert Einstein probably never thought he would be earning money from making babies smarter. But Baby Einstein, a majority Disney-owned suite of learning tools for infants, keeps expanding. International licensing with Nestle’s Japanese coffee brand, Charge, and an upcoming sneaker campaign with basketball player Kobe Bryant add to Einstein’s rich portfolio of deals.

None of which should surprise readers of symmetry, who in the February 2005 issue found this ode to the great man’s pervasive presence:

 “I Discovered the Theory of Relativity and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt”
by Judy Jackson

His mug’s on mugs,
Bears wear his hair;
Albert turns up everywhere.

His famed equation greets the eyes
From every form of merchandise;
T-shirts and ties he doth adorn.
Is there Albert Einstein porn?

Tots and geezers recognize him;
Every market sector buys him.
The world, it seems, will never weary
Of him and his relativity theory.

Year after year, folks take a likin’
To Einstein as a cultural icon.
Font of a vast commercial venture, he
Made Time magazine’s “Man of the Century.”

Who’d have thought a patent clerk
Would rise above that line of work
To symbolize for humankind
The greatness of the human mind?

That hair, that tongue, that life, that brain–
Remind us of all we might attain.
Would Albert E. have found it rich
To have become the king of kitsch?

Take that, Andy Warhol! (#8 on the list, with a measly $9 million in earnings.)

Glennda Chui

No Comments »

Materials scientist will take the helm at DESY

October 30, 2008 | 7:13 pm

Helmut Dosch, new director-general of DESY

Helmut Dosch, new director-general of DESY

DESY, the German national research center in Hamburg, announced today that Helmut Dosch has been appointed to replace retiring director Albrecht Wagner.

Dosch is a materials scientist; Wagner is a particle physicist. So the change would seem to reflect a recent global shift in the field.  Labs have been shutting down their particle-physics experiments in favor of collaborating on the next big thing, the Large Hadron Collider on the Swiss-French border. At the same time, many are building or expanding programs in photon science, which uses particle accelerators to generate intense beams of X-ray light. That light can be used to examine all sorts of things, from the proteins that make our bodies function to killer bacteria and exotic materials. You can think of them as super-microscopes, as handy an all-purpose tool as the Swiss Army knife.

DESY

DESY

DESY is no exception to the general trend. Last year it closed its HERA accelerator, which in 15 years  of operation produced a suite of remarkable results; see this story in symmetry. Meanwhile, it’s coordinating the construction of the accelerator for XFEL, the European X-ray laser project, which is designed to allow scientists to take stop-motion films of atoms in action, and it’s running three more photon-science projects.

However, Wagner says the change in leadership at DESY is not as jarring as it might seem.

I caught him this morning at a seminar held every three years by ICFA, the International Committee on Future Accelerators, which Wagner chairs. This time around it’s at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Albrecht Wagner

Albrecht Wagner

“I don’t really see it as a dramatic shift, which people sometimes seem to associate with a director who comes from a different field,” Wagner said. “What I can say, having talked with Helmut Dosch very extensively, is that he shares the overall view of what the strength of DESY is, and therefore how DESY should continue.  It’s really built on three pillars–namely the accelerators, which are the core business of DESY, and science in particle physics and with X-rays, from materials science to biology.”

Like most particle physics labs around the world, DESY is deeply involved in the LHC, which just began operation at CERN (although a mishap promptly shut it down again until next spring or summer.)  And after developing key technology for the proposed International Linear Collider, it’s now the biggest test bed for that technology.

Dosch, who will take over as director on March 1, is director of the Max Planck Institute for Metals Research and chair for Experimental Solid State Physics at Stuttgart University. He’s known for his research on nanomaterials and solid-state interfaces.

But he’s also quite familiar with DESY. He served on the DESY Scientific Council, which advises the lab’s director, and as a member of the German Science Council helped to evaluate some of the lab’s key programs. Those programs led DESY to its major role in developing technology for the International Linear Collider and to the development of XFEL, which is scheduled to start commissioning in 2013.

The DESY leadership nudged the lab in its current direction seven or eight years ago, with the decision to close HERA. Now it’s about to submit a proposal for the next five years. When it became clear last summer that Dosch would likely be the new director, he was brought into the conversation about the lab’s future.

“He was included in all the major strategic discussions,” Wagner said. “I’m very pleased, by the way, by how the process went. I clearly see that this will be a very smooth transition.”

For his part, Dosch had this to say in a press release issued by DESY:

DESY is a brand name standing for top research worldwide. With the new accelerator facilities which are currently built in Hamburg, DESY will shed light on so far unexplored dimensions in nanospace and will continue to play a leading role in the international top league of large-scale research. Particularly, we will further strengthen the collaboration with CERN and the University of Hamburg and create a magnet for junior scientists.

Glennda Chui

No Comments »