August 2009 issue of symmetry now online

August 19, 2009 | 1:36 pm

We’ve been calling this our Manga issue because it highlights the work of Takuya Uruno, who created a physics Manga series for kids for the Japanese laboratory KEK–featured in our gallery–and also drew us a gorgeous Manga cover.

The new issue also features:

– Youhei Morita on Manga as a learning tool.

Fermilab’s push to develop superconducting radio-frequency technology, considered crucial for the future of particle physics.

– How physicists at the LHC experiments are using the shutdown to their advantage

– A choreographer translates conversations with CERN physicists into dance

– Building better heart valves, the first in a new series on applications of accelerator technology

– The director of Japan’s Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe takes tea with the Emperor

– As always, our departments: Signal to Background, highlights from symmetry breaking, a 60-second explanation of Cherenkov lightthoughts on physics, technology and culture from the editor-in-chief, and a logbook from the discovery of the weak neutral current. The mathematical framework that predicted the weak neutral current became known as the Standard Model of particles and their interactions.

Glennda Chui

2 Comments »

Physicists play high-energy game of catch

August 17, 2009 | 10:02 am

The Washington Post today explains the cross-state particle physics experiment NOvA, which has been kicked into high-gear this summer with the help of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding.

Scientists are playing an exotic game of pitch and catch between Illinois and Minnesota. Their catcher’s mitt is solid iron, weighs 5,500 tons, and is parked in northern Minnesota in an abandoned iron mine. With millions of dollars from the federal stimulus package, construction crews are now building a second mitt near the Canadian border. It’s even heavier, some 15,000 tons, and is made of 385,000 liquid-filled cells of PVC plastic.

Five hundred miles to the south is the pitcher: Fermilab, a sprawling U.S. government laboratory west of Chicago where physicists do violent things with tiny particles.

The article goes on to give excellent explanations of the mysteries and behavior of neutrinos as well as why scientists consider the tiny particles key to understanding the universe.

The story by reporter Joel Achenbach also hints at how the basic research project could create a starting point for industrial applications that keep stimulating the economy long into the future.

This kind of basic research in particle physics has no obvious application to day-to-day life in the short run, but scientists say it’s likely to change society down the road.

“The technological impact of basic science has enormously changed the way we all live,” Marshak said. “It’s like when Albert Einstein came out with general relativity in 1915: he had no idea that Minnesota would use it, via GPS satellites, in order to plow straight rows of corn — in the dark.”

Read the full article here.

Tona Kunz

No Comments »

Recovery Act pushes high-field magnet development forward

August 14, 2009 | 6:37 am

This is the cable winding machine Fermilab will use for high-field magnets. Photo: Fermilab

A collaboration of national laboratories, universities, and industry may soon begin testing a new material that could help to revolutionize the superconducting magnet field.

The US Department of Energy is providing $4 million in Recovery Act funds to the Very High Field Superconducting Magnet Collaboration to test BSCCO2212, a bismuth-based material that may allow scientists to create high-field superconducting magnets that could achieve more than twice the strength of existing magnets. Fermilab will manage $1.5 million of the new funds and has already started making cable to test the new material.

Both the Tevatron and the Large Hadron Collider at CERN use superconducting magnets made out of niobium-titanium to steer beams of particles in accelerators. The Tevatron’s magnets have a field of 4 Tesla, and the LHC’s magnets can achieve 8 Tesla. Recent tests on alternative materials, such as niobium-tin, reached a magnetic field of 13 Tesla.

The development of high-field magnets that can exceed 50 Tesla could provide a path forward for a possible muon collider at Fermilab.

Led by spokesperson David Larbalestier of Florida State University, collaboration members believe that BSCCO2212 is the answer. But because it has a completely different structure than niobium, it comes with a whole new set of challenges, namely that it breaks very easily.

“In order to turn it into a superconductor, we heat the BSCCO2212 up to 800 degrees,” said Fermilab physicist Alvin Tollestrup. “The trouble is that it becomes more or less a ceramic. If you bend it, it breaks.”

In the project’s first phase, Fermilab will purchase the bismuth-based material from US vendors to conduct cabling and coil studies. Collaboration members will research the material’s properties in detail and determine how much they can stretch it and whether they can make it into cables. Collaboration member institutions include: Brookhaven National Laboratory, Fermilab, Florida State University, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology and Texas A&M University.

In addition, collaboration members will partner with businesses to encourage industrial fabrication of high-field magnets, an effort that could result in cutting edge technologies for other applications. Fermilab’s development and construction of the first reliable superconducting accelerator magnets for the Tevatron approximately 30 years ago led to industrial fabrication that resulted in such applications as medical MRI systems.

“Superconducting magnets have been one of the main keys for enabling technology,” Tollestrup said. “There is no doubt that there are uses both in high-energy physics and areas of industry and medicine that will require high-field magnets.”

Elizabeth Clements

No Comments »

Obama gives theoretical physicist Medal of Freedom

August 13, 2009 | 10:36 am

President Barack Obama Tuesday awarded 16 people the 2009 Presidential Medal of Freedom, including two scientists: theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking of Cambridge University and Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics and geneticist Janet Davison Rowley of the University of Chicago.

This is America’s highest civilian honor bestowed by the government. Award recipients are chosen for their exceptional contribution to the security or national interests of the United States, world peace, or cultural or other significant public or private endeavors. This year’s awardees were chosen for their work as agents of change–discovering new theories, launching new initiatives, and opening minds.

Hawking has been instrumental in the study of cosmology, quantum gravity, and black holes. He also has helped bring science to a wider audience through his books and talks. His academic success and openness has also helped to dispel stereotypes about the limits of contributions by people with disabilities.

“These outstanding men and women represent an incredible diversity of backgrounds,” Obama said in a press release. “Their tremendous accomplishments span fields from science to sports, from fine arts to foreign affairs. Yet they share one overarching trait: Each has been an agent of change.  Each saw an imperfect world and set about improving it, often overcoming great obstacles along the way.

“Their relentless devotion to breaking down barriers and lifting up their fellow citizens sets a standard to which we all should strive,” he added.

Citation for Hawking:

Persistent in his pursuit of knowledge, Stephen Hawking has unlocked new pathways of discovery and inspired people around the world. He has dedicated his life to exploring the fundamental laws that govern the universe, and he has contributed to some of the greatest scientific discoveries of our time. His work has stirred the imagination of experts and lay persons alike. Living with a disability and possessing an uncommon ease of spirit, Stephen Hawking’s attitude and achievements inspire hope, intellectual curiosity, and respect for the tremendous power of science.

Citation for Rowley:

Dr. Janet Davison Rowley was the first scientist to identify a chromosomal translocation as the cause of leukemia and other cancers–considered among the most important medical breakthroughs of the past century. After enrolling at the University of Chicago at age 15, she went on to challenge the conventional medical wisdom about the cause of cancer in the 1970s, which had placed little emphasis on chromosomal abnormalities. Her work has proven enormously influential to researchers worldwide who have used her discovery to identify genes that cause fatal cancers and to develop targeted therapies that have revolutionized cancer care. The United States honors this distinguished scientist for advancing genetic research and the understanding of our most devastating diseases.

View the full list of awardees.

Tona Kunz

No Comments »

Fermilab in the house: the Original Gangsta atom smasher gets its own rap

August 12, 2009 | 9:05 am

“…rock stars of physics, particle business
smash matter, antimatter and witness
quarks, bottom to top they don’t stop
‘where the Higgs at?’ yo that’s their mark
‘where the Higgs at?’ ”

- Funky49, “Particle Business”

Funky49 debuts a rap about Fermilab

Funky49 debuts a rap about Fermilab

Check it: sick rhymes and sweet beats meet hardcore science. Physics rap is in the house.

Before you say, “I’ve heard that before,” listen up–this isn’t the Large Hadron Rap, the surprise sensation that’s logged more than 5 million views on YouTube. There’s a brand-new riff on particle physics, created by rapper and science enthusiast Funky49, a.k.a. Steven Rush.  It’s called the Fermilab Rap, or “Particle Business,” and it’s a tad slicker and a touch edgier than any physics rap you’ve heard before.

“I didn’t want to do a facsimile of the LHC rap,” Rush explained before the rap’s premier performance Tuesday at Fermilab. “I wanted Fermilab to have its own voice.”

So did Ben Kilminster, a physicist on Fermilab’s CDF experiment and singer in CDF’s resident rock band, the Drug Sniffing Dogs. He read about Rush’s previous project, an album promoting the Museum of Science and Industry in the artist’s native city of Tampa, Florida, and suggested that the rapper turn his creative energy toward America’s leading particle accelerator.

“It’s true that the main motivation was to compete with the LHC rap, but overall I think just think it’s a fun addition,” Kilminster said. “Some people will never want to watch it, but for others, it might be the only way they learn something about Fermilab.”

With Kilminster’s encouragement and the backing of Fermilab’s Office of Communication, Rush dove head-first into the project. He drew inspiration from popular chart-topping rappers and The Atom Smashers documentary about the race between Fermilab and the European particle physics laboratory CERN to find the Higgs boson particle. Rap aficionados will recognize nods to rap’s common phrases, like OG, or original gangsta, and themes, such as a battle for superiority. Science enthusiasts will discover that scientific accuracy and head-bobbing rhymes can coexist and recognize comments on the state of science funding.

Funky49 will film a music video for the piece this week at Fermilab with help of the producer of Nerdcore for Life, a documentary about the growing trend in science- and technology-based rap music.

Before giving Fermilab scientists and local media a taste of the video to come, Funky49 spent a few minutes schooling them on the benefits of using rap in science outreach.

“Rap is very accessible to both the listener and the creator,” Rush said. “It started with people dancing on the street, and that’s still the spirit of it. It’s very adaptable. And the rhyme is catchy.”

While rhyme is close to Rush’s heart, so is high-energy physics. He’s proud to say that he owes his day job as a computer specialist at a radiobiology company to superconducting magnets.

“But most people don’t know that we have MRIs because particle physicists developed those magnets,” he laments. “I think we need to use as many communication avenues as possible to tell people about science. If they know how many useful applications come out of physics research, they’ll be a lot more interested in supporting it.”

Rush especially hopes his rap will reach people who don’t already have an ear for science. “One of my goals is to get people who are into hip-hop to just get into the sound. If they like the song, maybe they’ll want to hear another one, and maybe eventually they’ll find an article to read.”

And what about people who think physics rap is silly, or just a passing fad? Rush shrugs them off.

“There are always gonna be haters,” he says. “If the appeal is partly in the novelty, so be it. The point is that, for the time being, it’s getting people informed and excited.”

by Rachel Carr

Symmetry Intern

1 Comment »

Mini-golfing our way through the cosmos

August 11, 2009 | 3:51 pm

We rocketed up and out of the tunnel and into the open air; my fellow traveler and I sailed above Queens, watching as Manhattan grew smaller in the distance. As the train launched us further into the outer limits, we noticed the vast expanse of space above us. Landing at our final destination, we begin our adventure in the cosmos.

Our long ride took us to Flushing Meadows, Queens and home of the New York Hall of Science, built in 1964 as part of the World’s Fair.

Rocket Golf. Photo courtesy of NYHOS.

Rocket Park Mini Golf. Photo courtesy of NYHOS.

The place was thriving when we arrived–crawling with kids and adults, and full of stuff to play with and climb on. My companion–who is not a science nerd–unpaid and giving up a Saturday, would serve as my litmus test for the Hall’s true entertainment value. We were there for their newest attraction: Rocket Park Mini Golf.

The course sits next to the Hall’s Rocket Park, which displays two breathtaking replicas of the Mercury and Gemini space capsules, plus actual Atlas and Titan II rocket boosters. These majestic structures alone got “wows” from Unpaid Companion and made my own heart skip a beat.

We were the only two people without kids dangling off us, and probably the only people taking careful note of the physics placards placed beside all nine holes of the course. The design of the course models a rocket launch–taking golfers on a journey from takeoff, through orbit, to reentry. Some of the holes actually proved too challenging for the six-year-old girls in front of us, but kept the two of us entertained. Around the fifth hole, Unpaid Companion turned to me and said, “I’m actually having a lot of fun right now!”

As for the physics, here are the nine holes we played:

1.       Launch Window. Putt yourself into orbit when the moon and other planets are aligned in such a way as to maximize your use of fuel and time. Getting the ball through a little hole that opens for only three seconds at a time stumped the two adults in front of us.

2.       Escape Velocity. To get away from Earth’s gravitational pull, hit your rocket with just enough force. Too much and it’ll shoot into space (and a booming voice over a speaker will announce “Mission Failure!”). Putt it too lightly and it’ll fall back down to Earth. A successful launch yields a blast-off sound effect.

3.       Zero Gravity. Putt a loop-the-loop around Earth with just enough force and you’ll demonstrate how a rocket orbiting around the Earth is still falling, but is going fast enough that it falls around the Earth instead of into it.

Earth's Orbit; Photo Courtesy of NYHOS

Earth's Orbit. Courtesy of NYHOS.

4.       Earth’s Orbit. Choose the best path to orbit around Earth. The right path leads your ball to a large funnel where your rocket goes around and around. At this point in the course, Unpaid Companion and I are tied.

5.       Space Docking. Join up with a space station in space; this is another hole emphasizing that timing is everything. Putt carefully into the orbiting rocket ships, but don’t miss and shoot off into space! Unpaid Companion flies off into an asteroid and I pull ahead.

6.       Space Junk. More than a million pieces of space junk, left over from previous missions and satellites, still orbit the Earth at 20,000 miles per hour. The sign reads, “At that speed, a screwdriver could put a hole in your ship.” Unpaid Companion takes a shameful number of strokes to get through the junk.

7.       Gravity Whip. Whip around Mars to get to Jupiter. This is one of the holes with really expert construction. With enough of a push straight down the green, the ball takes a curved path all the way around Mars, and is slung back in the other direction. It provided a nice demonstration of the concept, and once again tested the determination of the girls in front of us.

8.       Re-entry Angle. Another well-crafted hole that rewards subtlety over strength. Give your rocket enough oomph to get up a slight incline, but just enough that it falls back down to the Earth.

9.       Splash Down. Time to come back to Earth, where a rescue boat is waiting for you.

At the end of the day, the space junk hole sealed unpaid companion’s fate and I won the game. But we did leave feeling like we’d sailed through the cosmos.

The New York Times ran an article on the golf course, in which the writer did far more preparation than I and brought along two children and an astrophysicist. He concludes that the course did teach the kids a little about physics, and wonders what other kinds of science could be taught through mini golf.

Calla Cofield

No Comments »

Starving baby black holes?

August 10, 2009 | 11:52 am

A simulation shows a black hole, white, interacting with gas, blue, about 200 million years after the big bang. Image courtesy of Marcelo Alvarez, John H. Wise and Tom Abel.

A black hole, in white, interacts with gas, in blue, about 200 million years after the big bang. Click image to see simulation, both courtesy of Marcelo Alvarez, John H. Wise and Tom Abel.

In the infant universe there were no stars.  Less than a billion years later, stars not only existed, but some had also collapsed into supermassive black holes, with a million to a billion times the mass of our sun.

Astrophysicists have long assumed that the first black holes quickly put on weight as they gobbled up surrounding gas.  But supercomputer simulations at the Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology suggest otherwise.

From a press release in SLAC Today

In the simulation, clouds of gas left over from the Big Bang slowly coalesced under the force of gravity, and eventually formed the first stars. These massive, hot stars burned bright for a short time, emitting so much energy in the form of starlight that they pushed nearby gas clouds far away. Yet these stars could not sustain such a fiery existence for long, and they soon exhausted their internal fuel. This caused one of the stars in the simulation to collapse under its own weight, forming a black hole located in a pocket of emptiness. With very little matter in the near vicinity, this black hole was essentially “starved” of food on which to grow.

“Quasars [extremely strong sources of radiation] powered by black holes a billion times more massive than our sun have been observed in the early universe, and we have to explain how these behemoths could have grown so big so fast,” said [Marcelo] Alvarez. “Their origin remains among the most fundamental unanswered questions in astrophysics.”

One explanation for the existence of supermassive black holes in the early universe postulates that the first black holes were “seeds” that grew into much larger black holes by gravitationally attracting and then swallowing matter. But in their simulation, Alvarez, Abel and Wise found that such growth was negligible, with the black hole in the simulation growing by less than one percent of its original mass over the course of a hundred million years.

Glennda Chui

No Comments »

Muons at the science fair

August 7, 2009 | 9:33 am

Katrina Korman was only 15 years old when she started working with physicist Alec Habig on a science fair project.  She knew almost nothing about particle physics and computer programming when she began. Yet she dared to take on the challenge of analyzing the steady stream of muons that bombards Earth.

Katrina Korman

Katrina Korman

Korman isn’t a physics whiz kid, says Habig. Google her name and you’ll find more references to her pitching abilities than anything else. During her high school years, the Minnesota native filled her spare time with softball, tennis, volleyball, and hockey, two musical instruments, and activities with the National Honors Society.

When Korman entered her sophomore year, she was already a regular at the yearly science fair.  Twice she had presented the results of her experiments on how life in outer space might affect the growth of soybean plants. “At the time I think I wanted to work for NASA,” she says. “That was my dream job.”

Craving another project dealing with the cosmos, she asked her teacher Cynthia Welsh for a suggestion; Welsh set up a meeting with Habig, the director of graduate studies at the University of Minnesota Physics Department.

Habig, who regularly conducts outreach activities with nearby high schools, does research with a handful of physics experiments, including the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search.  The MINOS experiment uses two giant particle detectors, one located at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois and the other at the Soudan mine in northern Minnesota, to study neutrinos.

The MINOS detector at Soudan is buried more than a half mile underground, where rock shields it from cosmic rays that hit Earth continuously. Nevertheless, some high-energy muons still manage to reach the detector, where they create significant static in the MINOS neutrino data.

But does the stream of muons vary over the course of a year?

Data gathered by many other particle physics experiments had hinted at seasonal fluctuations in the rate at which cosmic muons strike the Earth. Few scientists, however, had done a complete analysis to prove the existence of the effect or examined the fluctuations quantitatively.

This was the first time one of Habig’s science-fair students would approach a real-life particle physics problem, providing results that he and his colleagues could use. Habig felt that the analysis of MINOS data would offer the right skill level for a high school student like Korman. Because he was fairly certain the analysis would have a positive result, he thought it would also prove fun and rewarding.

Starting from square one, Korman spent most of her summer learning how to write computer code while Habig taught her particle physics. He and her high school teacher offered support and assistance as Korman wrote a computer program to sift through MINOS data to look for seasonal muon fluctuations.

For Korman, this science fair project was a big departure from growing plants and watching their progress over weeks.

“With the soybeans you grow the plants and you take the measurements yourself and you put them in the graphs. With [the MINOS] project it’s less hands-on,” she says. “You feel like you’re not getting anywhere until you see the results and then you’re like, ‘Oh! That’s neat!’”

Habig says Korman’s greatest strength was simply her determination to finish the project.

“The thing that made it work very well was [Katrina] was very motivated and diligent and willing to sit down and learn apparently irrelevant stuff like programming and statistics,” Habig says. “She’s different from many physics majors who come in thinking a lot of stuff is really neat, and they are really surprised that it’s a lot of work. So as a result, physics programs lose maybe half of declared majors. She wasn’t necessarily a big fan of physics, but there was a project that was interesting and she wanted to do it and was willing to sit down and do the work to get it done.”

The MINOS particle detector, located a half mile underground in the Soudan Underground Laboratory in Minnesota, weighs 6000 tons.

The MINOS particle detector, located a half mile underground in the Soudan Underground Laboratory in Minnesota, weighs 6000 tons.

The project gave Korman a close-up look at what particle physicists are doing. Habig took Korman on a tour of the MINOS detector at Soudan, and she and her father watched the launch of a weather balloon carrying instruments to measure atmospheric conditions to associate with the MINOS data on muons. These were the project’s biggest highlights, she says.

Korman took her project to the regional science fair that fall and moved on to the state competition that spring. She’d successfully shown that there is indeed a fluctuation in the muon rate as the seasons change and the atmospheric conditions change.

After that year’s science fair, the project was over for Korman. But her analysis became the basis for a Ph.D. thesis by Eric Grashorn, a graduate student working under Habig. He took Korman’s work and went deeper, finding a way to calculate the quantitative fluctuations in muon showers during the year. To honor the work she’d done to get the ball rolling, the scientists included Korman as a coauthor on the paper.  (For more on this work and its significance, see “Cosmic Weather Gauges” in the March 09 issue of symmetry.)

Habig says he’ll definitely consider doing a similar project with another student in the future. In the meantime, his work with Korman will provide a valuable example in his upcoming outreach efforts.

“When I’m talking to classes of undergraduates or high school students I try to put in a slide with pictures of students like them who have done work with neutrinos or cosmic rays in the past. And that makes [the new students] feel like this stuff is not off on another planet,” Habig says. “Giving them some tangible evidence that other students like them have understood this stuff in the past makes them want to try harder to understand it.”

And, as Habig points out, the project still achieved the ultimate goal of increasing one student’s scientific literacy.

“Even if Katrina has nothing to do with science for the rest of her life, 20 years from now she’ll pick up a newspaper and read a science story and she’ll have a framework for it,” Habig says.

Now, as Katrina prepares for her freshman year of college, she still isn’t sure if science is the path she’ll take. Even if she doesn’t follow in Habig’s footsteps and become a physicist, she thinks the experience taught her a great deal about her own abilities and where her interests lie. As part of her resume, the MINOS project even may have helped Katrina get into a good school.  This fall she’ll attend the University of St. Thomas in St. Paul, Minnesota.

“The funny thing is, I’ve done all these science projects and I still just feel like I’m in over my head,” says Korman. Would she recommend a science project such as this one to other high school students?  “Yes and no,” she says. “You obviously have to know what you’re getting into. You have to be prepared to feel like you don’t know what’s going on. But I think it would be good for kids to learn.”

Calla Cofield

No Comments »

New round of stimulus funds includes $327M for DOE science

August 4, 2009 | 5:31 pm

From today’s US Department of Energy press release:

Of the $327 million in Recovery Act funding announced today, $107.5 million is slated to go to universities, nonprofit organizations, and private firms, generally on a competitive, peer-reviewed basis. The remaining $220 million will go to U.S. Department of Energy National Laboratories for a range of research, instrumentation, and infrastructure projects, including $164.7 million for projects already allocated as follows:

Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory; Batavia, IL$60.2 million, including $52.7 million for research on next-generation particle accelerator technologies; and $7.5 for neutrino research in collaboration with Brookhaven National Laboratory.

Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory; Berkeley, CA$ 37.8 million, including $13.1 million to upgrade equipment at the DOE Joint Genome Institute; $11 million for fusion energy research; $8.8 million for equipment improvements at the Advanced Light Source; $4 million for new instrumentation at the DOE Joint BioEnergy Institute, one of three DOE Bioenergy Research Centers; and $875,000 for mathematical analysis related to the development of Smart Grid technology.

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory; Stanford, CA$21.8 million, including $20 million for an experimental end station at the Linac Coherent Light Source to study high energy density plasmas; and $1.8 million for improvements at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource.

Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory; Princeton, NJ$13.8 million, including $8.8 million for a variety of initiatives in fusion energy research and $5 million for infrastructure improvements at the laboratory.

Brookhaven National Laboratory; Upton, NY$9.5 million, including $3 million for improvements at the National Synchrotron Light Source; and $6.5 million for neutrino research.

Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Oak Ridge, TN$8.7 million, including $5.4 million for equipment at the DOE BioEnergy Science Center, a DOE Bioenergy Research Center; $3.2 million to seed development of computerized knowledgebase to integrate masses of data flowing from DOE-supported genomics and systems biology research; and $180,000 for fusion energy research.

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; Richland, WA$5.7 million, including $4.9 million for integrated assessment modeling for climate; and $867,000 for mathematical analysis related to the development of Smart Grid.

Argonne National Laboratory; Argonne, IL$5.6 million for improvements at the Advanced Photon Source.

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory; Livermore, CA$810,000 for fusion energy research.

Sandia National Laboratories; Sandia, NM, and Sandia, CA$800,000, including $688,000 for mathematical analysis related to the development of Smart Grid; and $75,000 for fusion energy research.

In March Secretary Chu announced $1.2 billion in DOE Office of Science Recovery Act projects. In July, DOE announced a new Office of Science Early Career Research Program to be funded with $85 million in Recovery Act funds. With this third and final round of projects, the Obama Administration has now approved projects covering the full $1.6 billion that the DOE Office of Science received from Congress under the Recovery Act.

 We’ll bring you details as they become available.   In the meantime, here’s some background on how the first round of stimulus funding is being put to work at SLAC, Fermilab, Lawrence Berkeley lab, Argonne, and Brookhaven.

Glennda Chui

No Comments »

Happy birthday to charm!

August 3, 2009 | 3:35 pm

 

Shawne Workman reports in SLAC Today:

Today, charm turns 45. Sheldon Glashow and James Bjorken coined the term “charm” for a theoretical new particle, the charm quark, in a paper published in Physical Review Physics Letters on August 1, 1964. The paper is available full-text, online [subscription required for full text] from SPIRES-HEP database: Elementary Particles and SU(4)

 

Thanks to SLAC archivist Jean Deken for passing along along this gem.

 

So what’s the perfect gift for a middle-aged yet still mysteriously alluring particle?  A charm plushie comes to mind:

 

 

 

 

 

As for allure, check out “Chasing Charm in China” from the May 2009 issue of symmetry, which describes how the quest to understand charm quarks and related particles has lured American scientists to the newly upgraded Beijing Electron Positron Collider.

 

Glennda Chui

No Comments »