D.C. workshop envisions the Intensity Frontier

November 29, 2011 | 12:00 pm

Fermilab Today published this story on Nov. 29, 2011. For more information about the workshop follow the hashtag #intensityfrontier. 

At the Intensity Frontier, scientists use high energy beams and sensitive particle detectors to explore rare subatomic processes in search of answers to profound questions. More than 500 scientists are gathering this week to discuss the future role of the U.S. in these experiments. They will discuss the most exciting opportunities, the potential for new discoveries and the equipment and technology required for these new experiments.

The workshop, named “Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier” and held from Nov. 30 to Dec. 2 near Washington, D.C., is split into six working groups. Speakers from each group will provide an overview of their study area and its future goals to an audience spanning the breadth of the physics community. Then medium-sized groups will break away for debates and discussions designed to stimulate open conversations.

“This will be a good opportunity for people in more specialized areas to interact and learn from each other and hopefully reinforce each other’s case for this physics,” said Jack Ritchie, a co-convener for the Heavy Quarks group and professor in the physics department at the University of Texas, Austin.

In recent years, the Intensity Frontier has become a top priority for fields like nuclear physics, according to Michael Ramsey-Musolf, a physics professor at the University of Wisconsin at Madison and a co-convener for the Nucleons, Nuclei and Atoms group.

“There’s a lot of synergy between high-energy physics, nuclear physics and cosmology and they all meet at the Intensity Frontier field,” he said.

The workshop also brings together scientists from similar research areas, such as muon physicists from experiments like Muon g-2, Mu2e and the proposed Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment, according to David Hertzog, a University of Washington physics professor and member of the Charged Leptons group.

“This community is scattered all over the planet,” he said. “In any one snapshot you don’t have everybody in the same room like this.”

While the DOE’s Office of Science will use the event to evaluate the science opportunities for the U.S. particle physics community in this field, the workshop will also be a learning experience for those new to the Intensity Frontier.

“It will be very good for me to learn more about what the physics goals are,” said Gerben Stavenga, a postdoctoral fellow researching theoretical physics and a speaker for the Proton Decay group. “We’re looking forward to what the Intensity Frontier will bring us.”

From graduate students to Fermilab physicists and DOE staff, the community in attendance will comprise a large spectrum of physics professionals. The working groups have spent months preparing for the workshop.

“It’s going to be a big crowd of people and a wide range of physics to cover,” said Rouven Essig, an assistant professor from Stony Brook University and co-convener for the Hidden Sector Photons, Axions, and WISPs group. “Many eyes are on the workshop and it will have an important impact on the future direction of this field.”

Brad Hooker

No Comments »

Physicists talk turkey

November 23, 2011 | 11:46 am

Looking for some help with cooking your Thanksgiving feast this holiday? Here are a couple of ways that particle physics can lend a hand.

The plastic industry uses particle accelerators to treat the sturdy shrink wrap that keep Butterball turkeys and many other food products fresh.

Not sure how long to cook your turkey? Take some advice from SLAC Director Emeritus Pief Panofsky and use the equation he derived for the holiday: = W(2/3)/1.5, where t is the cooking time in hours and W is the weight of the stuffed turkey, in pounds. The constant 1.5 was determined empirically.

If a Butterball turkey will take the spotlight on your table, you have particle accelerators to thank for its freshness. The food industry uses particle accelerators to produce the sturdy, heat-shrinkable film that Butterballs come wrapped in. When a beam of electrons from a particle accelerator hits the plastic wrapping, it causes a chemical reaction that makes the film super strong and heat resistant. The food industry purchases the treated shrink wrap from plastic manufacturers in the form of bags or rolls. A turkey gets placed inside, and voila, a fresh meal will soon grace your Thanksgiving table.

From all of us at symmetry magazine, have a wonderful Thanksgiving!

Elizabeth Clements

No Comments »

Muppet scientists at the LHC

November 23, 2011 | 10:32 am

If a big family trip to the movies is one of your Thanksgiving traditions, you might soon find yourself sitting with a fat tub of buttery popcorn at a screening of The Muppets, released today.

In the film, characters from original Muppets television show, which ran from 1976 to 1981, reunite after years apart to save their old theater from being razed by an oil tycoon. Physics fans will cheer to see that bespectacled scientist Dr. Bunsen Honeydew and his harried assistant, Beaker, seem to have moved on from their careers at Muppet Labs to work on the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. (Perhaps Beaker finally finished his post-doc.)

In the preview below, Kermit and the gang find the two in the ATLAS detector hall, where the frazzled red-head is sucked into a pneumatic tube system and shrunk small enough to fit in Dr. Honeydew’s pocket. LHC scientists are still puzzled as to how the Muppet could possibly enter the striped tubes, which are actually filled with cryogenics and superconducting magnets.

ATLAS physicist Steve Goldfarb said he hopes the Muppets will actually stop by the laboratory now that they’ve finished filming. “I have a lot of empathy for Beaker,” he said, “especially since I’ve worked on hardware.”

Read about more intersections of particle physics machines and cinema here and here.

Kathryn Grim

No Comments »

Tabletop ATLAS assembly, no hardhat required

November 22, 2011 | 4:00 pm

Physicist Sascha Mehlhase may have missed the actual construction of the ATLAS detector at CERN, but he found another way to experience the joy of building it – a way reminiscent of his childhood and the contents of a particularly good toy box he once had. He made the detector out of Legos.

Two colleagues at Mehlhase’s office at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen put forward the idea of building the detector out of Legos for a public event last year, but they never got around to doing it themselves. Last month as a similar event approached, Mehlhase decided to go for it. To the displeasure of his wife, he spent an entire weekend using the free digital designer software on Lego.com to translate photos and 3D renderings from the ATLAS website into a plan for plastic.

He scaled the model to a Lego man, a few centimeters in height, corresponding to a two-meter tall human, which made the finished masterpiece nearly a half-meter in height. The fixed selection of blocks, however, meant that everything didn’t scale with exactly 100 percent accuracy.

“Sometimes in LEGO you get these pieces in lengths of two, four, six or eight when a seven would be perfect,” Mehlhase said.

He convinced the head of his group to buy the 10,000 pieces his design called for, which arrived in a huge package with about two-thirds of its contents in need of sorting. Mehlhase and a few students started doing this by color and then by type – a task he estimates took about a quarter of the total time.

Soon Mehlhase discovered that the project was more formidable than he’d foreseen. An instruction manual created by the Lego software yielded “4,500 pages of almost useless material,” Mehlhase said. Because the detector is a symmetrical machine, inside-out assembly makes more sense than bottom-to-top, which the computer didn’t realize.

So he abandoned the manual. Instead, over the course of a few weeks, he spent 33 hours comparing the digital Lego design he’d made with his bins of sorted pieces, figuring out by sight where things should go.

“So far I’ve managed everything without glue,” he said.

The public event passed, but Mehlhase was on a mission. Brick by primary-colored brick he toiled. A few challenges scientists faced in creating the real ATLAS detector proved challenging in the LEGO model as well. For example, the outer magnets in both structures are much heavier than some internal pieces, yet they need to support themselves without breaking.

Mehlhase finished the mini-detector, complete with tiny technicians and red block “ATLAS” sign, in early November. His group at Copenhagen plans to use it for outreach. A few other institutions have emailed him about the designs, and he said he’d gladly share. He says he’d like to see his Lego ATLAS design at CERN one day.

For now Mehlhase plans to display the model in a glass case in the hallway outside his office. The real ATLAS detector may belong to the thousands of physicists who built and run it, but this one is all Copenhagen’s.

All images courtesy of Sascha Mehlhase.

Amy Dusto

1 Comment »

Favored Higgs hiding spot remains after most complete search yet

November 18, 2011 | 5:30 am

The Standard Model Higgs boson is excluded at a 95 percent confidence level everywhere the thick black line drops below the red line. Image: ATLAS and CMS experiments

The CMS and ATLAS experiments at the Large Hadron Collider have backed the Standard Model Higgs boson, if it exists, into a corner with their first combined Higgs search result.

The study, made public today, eliminates several hints the individual experiments saw in previous analyses but leaves in play the favored mass range for the Higgs boson, between 114 and 141 GeV. ATLAS and CMS ruled out at a 95 percent confidence level a Higgs boson with a mass between 141 and 476 GeV.

The new result combines eight studies of predicted decays of the Higgs boson using data the experiments collected up to July. Physicists expected to be able to rule out an even wider mass range, between 125 and 500 GeV, based on the amount of data used and the sensitivities of the different search modes. But small excesses that could be the result of statistical fluctuations or could indicate the presence of a hidden particle reduced the range of masses that could be excluded.

“I think it could be an interesting message the data is telling us,” said physicist Eilam Gross of the Weizmann Institute of Science, who shares leadership of the ATLAS experiment’s Higgs group. “Any discovery starts with the inability to exclude.”

Several related measurements indirectly suggest a Standard Model Higgs boson exists at the lower end of the mass range.

Almost a year of work, more than 50 meetings and plenty of diplomacy went into calculating the LHC experiments’ first combination of Higgs search results. Experts from both collaborations worked together for more than seven months to devise the combination procedure and for about one month to come up with the combined result. Then the two collaborations, each a few thousand members strong, took about a month to review and approve it.

“This is really a landmark achievement,” said CMS physicist Vivek Sharma of the University of California, San Diego, co-leader of the Higgs combination group. “Combining LHC Higgs search results is not a straightforward process. There’s a lot going on under the hood.”

Since July, the two experiments have accumulated two to four times as much data. By the end of 2012, they hope to at least double that.

The end of the Standard Model Higgs search is in sight, said ATLAS physicist Bill Murray of the U.K. Science and Technology Facilities Council, co-leader of the Higgs combination group. “This year’s data will probably give us the answer, but next year we will be able to announce it firmly,” he said.

So far, the ATLAS and CMS experiments have not yet decided to produce a second Higgs combination based on results from the full 2011 dataset. The two experiments are still in competition; they might wait to see what they can accomplish on their own before working together again.

“This was a chance to go through the process when the results were uncontroversial,” Sharma said. “Now we’re in discovery mode. The next time won’t be so calm.”

Kathryn Grim

5 Comments »

Faster-than-light neutrino measurement withstands new test

November 17, 2011 | 7:29 pm

"Scientists modified the beam of neutrinos traveling through the Earth from CERN to INFN. Image: Jean-Luc Caron

The OPERA experiment’s surprising superluminal neutrino result is holding fast after a new measurement designed to eliminate a possible source of systematic error from their previous tests.

OPERA scientists reported the new results in a press release and a paper released on the arXiv today.

“The positive outcome of the test makes us more confident in the result,” said Fernando Ferroni, president of the Italian Institute for Nuclear Physics. But “a final word can only be said by analogous measurements performed elsewhere in the world.”

Accordingly, OPERA and other experiments, including Fermilab’s MINOS and KEK laboratory’s T2K, will continue collecting data in the coming year.

OPERA scientists first presented their neutrino measurement on Sept. 23. The experiment measures the velocity of particles as they arrive at detectors at Gran Sasso National Laboratory in Italy from 730 kilometers away at CERN in Geneva, Switzerland. September’s baffling results showed the neutrinos arriving in Italy 60 nanoseconds before light, a feat that seemed to break the laws of physics. Theorists have not been able to explain how the result could be true, but experimentalists have not been able to explain how it could be false.

For the new measurement, CERN operators spaced particle bunches in the neutrino beam farther apart by as much as 524 nanoseconds and sent them to Italy in short, three nanosecond pulses. This allowed OPERA physicists to trace neutrinos measured at the final destination back to the exact pulse from which they came. Last time the neutrino bunches were so close together that physicists had to rely on statistics to determine which one corresponded to each observed neutrino. The new arrangement got rid of at least this source of potential fuzziness.

Although this narrower, sparser beam led to more accurate definitions of the particles’ velocities, it also meant that physicists had fewer events to observe overall. In fact, OPERA measured only 20 events this way – one reason the collaboration will need more measurements before concluding anything with certainty.

Amy Dusto

5 Comments »

Pivotal pivoter test paves way for 15,000-ton plastic behemoth

November 17, 2011 | 8:53 am

It could be the largest structure ever to be built from plastic. Its footprint of 1,052 square meters will cover an area about the size of a quarter of a football field. Its height will rise past the top of a five-story apartment building. And with 368,640 tubes of white PVC, the structure will have about as many components as some of the largest LEGO structures built in the world.

The NOvA detector will comprise 368,640 PVC tubes that will be filled with mineral oil. A company in Wisconsin extrudes the tubes, which look like extra-long downspouts, in panels of 16. Credit: Rich Talaga, Argonne

But this huge structure, to be constructed in Ash River, Minn., won’t serve as a plastic replica. It will be the skeleton of a fully functional particle detector. Wired with fiber optic cables and filled with 500 truckloads of mineral oil, the 15,000-ton NOvA detector will enable scientists to discover how the masses of the three types of neutrinos—the lightest, tiniest particles known to mankind—stack up.

Last week, the preparations for the assembly of this white PVC behemoth passed a pivotal test. In an assembly building at Fermilab, 40 miles west of Chicago, scientists, engineers and technicians from Fermilab, Argonne National Laboratory and the University of Minnesota successfully operated for the first time the NOvA pivoter, the hydraulic system developed by Fermilab to move and rotate huge, 200-ton plastic blocks for the assembly of the NOvA detector. (See this 3-minute video with a time lapse of the pivoter test and a fly-through animation of the NOvA detector hall.)

“This is a big deal,” said Fermilab physicist Pat Lukens, who manages the assembly of the detector. “Now the focus will shift to Ash River. We will assemble 500 truckloads of plastic modules.”

But this is no ordinary plastic. Argonne’s Rich Talaga and other NOvA collaborators spent many years finding the right ingredients to produce the strongest and most reflective PVC for the 16-meter-long tubes that hold and support the weight of the mineral oil.

Using a machine developed and tested at Argonne National Laboratory, technicians apply special no-drip glue to a NOvA panel to create blocks that are 16 meters by 16 meters square and weigh 200 tons. Credit: Rich Talaga, Argonne

“Ordinary plastic tends to deform under pressure,” said Talaga, who worked closely with Fermilab’s Anna Pla-Dalmau. “Think of a plastic coat hanger. It changes shape when you put a sweater on it. We had to find a plastic that has to be strong for 20 years and doesn’t get weaker and rupture.”

For Extrutech Plastics in Manitowoc, Wisc., a company that makes PVC wall and ceiling panels and other plastic products, the purchase order for the NOvA tubes was the largest ever. The company has begun the production of the PVC panels, which look like 16 extra-long downspouts with a four-by-six-centimeter cross section attached side-by-side. The panels, which must meet the tight specifications for the thickness and uniformity of the NOvA plastic, are shipped to a warehouse rented by the University of Minnesota. There, students and technicians outfit each tube with a fiber optic cable that will capture the faint light that a neutrino creates when it breaks up an atom in the mineral oil. Avalanche photodiodes attached to each fiber will record and amplify the signal, which is then digitized and transmitted to the central data acquisition system.

To make sure that no light gets lost, Talaga and his group used a special PVC formulation that includes large amounts of titanium-dioxide to create a strong plastic that is white and highly reflective.

“The oil doesn’t absorb much light,” said Talaga. “The light created by a neutrino interaction is either absorbed by the walls of the tubes or by the fiber optic cable inside each tube. By making the walls highly reflective, the light bounces back eight, nine or ten times without significant absorption and you see a stronger signal in the fiber.”

Engineers at Fermilab designed and tested a hydraulic system that will move and rotate the huge, 200-ton plastic blocks for the assembly of the NOvA detector. Credit: Reidar Hahn, Fermilab

To transform the roughly 24,000 plastic panels into one giant particle detector, technicians will place 24 panels next to each other to make a layer of tubes, 16 meters by 16 meters square. After an application of special no-drip glue, the next layer will be placed on top, with the tubes lying perpendicularly to the layer below. Gluing and lifting of the 1,000-pound panels will be done with machines developed and tested at Argonne, where the first set of machines was used to build the test block used on the pivoter at Fermilab.

The Argonne group just finished the installation of the first gluing machine at Ash River. The full-size pivoter, six times as wide as the one tested at Fermilab, is under construction and will be ready for operation early next year. Bill Miller, of the University of Minnesota, who participated in the pivoter test at Fermilab, will lead the assembly of the detector in Ash River. He will supervise local staff, hired by the University of Minnesota for the task.

“We plan to assemble the first block in Ash River this spring,” said Lukens, who’s overseen the development of the NOvA assembly plans for three years. “It will take 18 months to assemble the entire detector.”

Scientists from 28 institutions are working on the NOvA experiment. When operational, the experiment will examine the world’s highest-intensity, longest-distance neutrino beam, generated at the Fermilab. Accelerators will produce a beam of muon neutrinos that will travel straight through the earth to the NOvA detector in northern Minnesota. During their split-second trip to Ash River, some of these neutrinos will turn into electron neutrinos and tau neutrinos. By measuring the composition of the neutrino beam with a small, 222-ton detector at Fermilab and a large detector in Ash River, scientists expect to discover the neutrino mass hierarchy, determining whether there are two light neutrinos and one heavy one, or two heavy ones and a light one.

For photos of the construction of the NOvA detector building in Ash River, see the photo gallery in the October 2011 issue of symmetry magazine.

Kurt Riesselmann

No Comments »

The making and tending of heavy ion beams for the LHC

November 15, 2011 | 1:41 pm

Heavy-ion expert Detlef Kuchler holds a container of lead. Image: CERN

This week the Large Hadron Collider began heavy ion physics, the process of colliding lead ions to learn about conditions in the primordial universe.

The accelerator is expected to perform five to 10 times better than it did in its first run of these collisions last November. Although the heavy ion program will last only from now until CERN’s annual winter shutdown just after the first week of December, operators started preparations months in advance. Here symmetry breaking examines what it really takes to put lead beams in the LHC.

The source

Making heavy ions is more complicated than preparing the protons used in regular LHC collisions, which come from hydrogen gas. Since hydrogen atoms have only one proton and one electron each, applying a voltage to them is sufficient to rip off their electrons, leaving a load of beam-ready, positively charged protons. But the source for heavy ions, enriched lead, starts with 82 electrons. Physicists do not have miracle flypaper to grab that many subatomic particles at once, so the process takes a few steps.

Meet Detlef Kuchler, a heavy-ion expert who tends the lead source, the first part of the heavy-ion acceleration process, by hand. He helped develop the method of extracting lead ions decades ago and can explain from memory its hundreds of associated, unlabeled diagrams. Although several people work on the source, a flowchart of what to do when things go wrong at this stage dead-ends everywhere with, “Call the expert.” It may as well say, “Call Detlef.” He spends a lot of nights and weekends at CERN during heavy ion season.

Kuchler prepares the oven. Image: Amy Dusto

The oven

The first thing Kuchler does when it’s time to make heavy ions is prepare the oven, a palm-sized cylinder on a long pole that evaporates metallic lead. The whole thing fits into another machine that begins a chain of hand-offs from the source to the LHC. The lead must heat slowly in the oven or fragments spill out. Kuchler refills the oven once every two weeks.

The lab’s 10-gram stock of enriched lead costs $12,000. But so little is used at a time — about 500 milligrams per oven fill — that the bill equates to roughly $2 per hour. Not bad, in the scheme of accelerator operating costs.

Kuchler carefully unscrews the oven, takes it apart, cleans its seals with ethanol, measures and fills it with lead, puts it back together, enters the correct settings and turns it on. When symmetry visited, he searched with gloved hands for a leak around water tubes used for cooling and requested new O-rings to fix a vacuum connection somewhere. He usually finishes all the physical tweaks in less than half an hour.

“I know every screw of this machine,” he said. “It’s fun.”

Operators test beams of lead ions in this linear accelerator. Image: CERN

The beam

After lead evaporates in the oven, it moves into a chamber of plasma heated by microwaves. The lead gas loses some electrons when it hits the plasma. In 30 milliseconds, the ions inside have each lost varying amounts of the negatively charged particles, but the majority have lost 29, making their charge 29+. As they leave the chamber, the 29+ ions are separated from the rest and collected into a beam.

A newborn beam of lead ions spends its first hours in testing. Here, the human-machine interactions become less TLC and more CPU. Kuchler adjusts computer settings to send a bit of beam a few meters into a small, straight section of accelerator, where it hits a diagnostic device called a Faraday cup. Kuchler sees how he did from what the cup tells him, makes adjustments accordingly, heats a little more lead in the oven and repeats. Eventually, when the beam looks good enough, he retracts the Faraday cup from the path so that the beam may continue its tour of CERN’s accelerator complex on the way to the LHC.

Electronics that control every aspect of source machine settings sit in shelves all around the oven and the accelerator. “During the day I keep an eye on [the machine],” Kuchler said. He can easily pop down from his office any time. During the weeks of heavy-ion physics, he elects not to take any personal holidays so that even when he’s not at work, he’ll always be nearby. He and dozens of other experts work day and night and remain on-call after hours in case anything goes wrong.

The heavy-ion beams make their presence known through synchrotron light, which shows up as subtly shimmering spots on the screen. Image: CERN

The chain

In August, eight weeks after Kuchler began working on the source, he began letting the beam through to the Low Energy Ion Ring, where other people took over its testing and fine-tuning.

On the way to the ion ring, the beam passes briefly through an area where it encounters a number of 300-nanometer-wide stripping foils. These take off more electrons, increasing the ions’ charges to 54+. Next, at the LEIR, a process called beam cooling begins to reshape and intensify the beam, which the machine accelerates.

The newly narrowed beam travels from there to another accelerator, the Proton Synchroton, behind a wall in the same building. This accelerator takes the beam up to a higher energy and sends it through another stripping foil. Ions leave here at the charge with which they will collide: 82+.

The last checkpoint before the LHC is the second biggest accelerator at CERN: the Super Proton Synchroton. This machine further accelerates the ions. The Proton Synchrotron accelerator started sending beam to the SPS in September. Over the course of eight weeks, a team of physicists spent hours refining the machine’s settings in order to optimize the beam and prepare it for its final destination: the LHC.

The LHC

Operators declared "stable beams" today, which means the LHC is ready for heavy ion physics. Image: CERN

During the few days of tightly-scheduled heavy-ion commissioning, many additional experts join the usual operators at the LHC controls. They help troubleshoot to make sure the beams reach the precise conditions needed for physics. Lead beams here accelerate to 1.38 TeV per single proton or neutron inside the ion.

Three minutes after midnight on Sunday, Nov. 6, LHC accelerator physicist John Jowett captured an image of one moment in the process that always thrills him. When the lead beams in the LHC reach about twice their injection energy, they begin emitting enough radiation, called synchrotron light, to be seen by a special telescope and camera system in the accelerator.

“We see a shimmering spot on a screen,” Jowett said. “It’s as close as we get to seeing the beams of lead nuclei with our own eyes.”

At the end of that week, on Saturday, Nov. 12, at 6:41 a.m., operators declared “stable beams,” the machine term that indicates the LHC is ready for physics.

Amy Dusto

No Comments »

Fermilab’s Physics for Everyone lecture series resumes Nov. 16

November 15, 2011 | 12:28 pm

Fermilab Today published this story on Nov. 15, 2011. To watch past lectures, visit the Physics for Everyone website

Fermilab’s Tevatron program has shut down, but the laboratory’s other programs are going strong. Learn more about Fermilab’s future programs through the monthly Physics for Everyone lectures beginning again on Wednesday, Nov. 16.

This is the continuation of the series that began last year but took a hiatus over the summer. “Physics for Everyone” is a non-technical lecture series about Fermilab science and culture. From 12:30-1:30 p.m. on one Wednesday each month, Fermilab scientists and staff give a one-hour, straight-forward, plain English lecture on one of a wide variety of topics, including the history of the laboratory, how particle physics benefits society and even the laboratory’s involvement in cancer therapy.

This set of lectures features Fermilab’s future experiments and projects. The first lecture in the set will take place this Wednesday. Deputy Director Young-Kee Kim will give a talk titled “The New Frontier on the Great Plains: Fermilab and the future of particle physics.” The talk will include time for questions and answers. It will be video recorded and archived at a later date.

Other upcoming lectures in this set include:

  • Dec. 7, 2011 – “Project X: A powerful accelerator for particle physics” by Stuart Henderson
  • Jan. 11, 2012 – “Discovery science with muons: Fermilab’s Mu2e experiment” by Doug Glenzinski
  • Feb. 8, 2012 – “Looking for gold: LBNE in the Homestake Mine” by Brian Rebel

Information on upcoming lectures and video of previous lectures is available on the series website. This lecture series is organized by Fermilab’s Diversity Council Subcommittee for Non-Scientific and Non-Technical Employees.

Rhianna Wisniewski

No Comments »

LHCb uses charm to find asymmetry

November 14, 2011 | 1:25 pm

Photo from 2004 showing the two almost 30-ton magnets in the LHCb detector, which was under construction at the time. Image: CERN

According to theory, matter and antimatter should have been created in equal parts during the big bang. But somehow, the balance of the two skewed in the universe’s first moments. Now, matter dominates nature.

Scientists from the LHCb collaboration at CERN recently saw curious possible evidence of this asymmetry: The difference between the decay rates of certain particles in their detector, D and anti-D charm mesons, was higher than expected.

This anomaly is evidence of charge-parity violation, a more precise descriptor of nature’s preference for matter. Other LHC experiments have seen such symmetry breaking, but this is a first sighting in these charm particles.

“CP violation is expected to be very small in charm physics,” LHCb member Bolek Pietrzyk said. “This is a really surprising result.”

The preliminary findings, which the collaboration presented Monday night in Paris, have a significance measured at 3.5 sigmas. Statistically speaking, this indicates an interesting observation. But scientists will need more certainty before they can declare a discovery.

In this study, the group used data they collected in the first half of 2011. LHCb’s next steps will be to look at the rest of the 2011 data and see whether they can make sense of the observations within the Standard Model theory, or if they’ll need a new explanation.

View the presentation about the LHCb result

Read the CERN Bulletin article

Amy Dusto

No Comments »