CERN partners with Google in global science fair

February 28, 2011 | 3:51 pm

The Google Science Fair is taking science contests to a new global level. CERN, home to the Large Hadron Collider, has partnered with Google to create a prize package to match the scope of the fair.

A three-day trip to CERN is one of several prizes that the Google Science Fair winner may select.

A three-day trip to CERN is one of several prizes that the winner of the Google Science Fair may select.

One lucky winner will have the opportunity to spend three days at the CERN laboratory in Geneva, Switzerland. The winner would visit the laboratory and experimental areas, take part in shifts in the control room at the LHC, and experience science in the making by becoming an apprentice physicist.

CERN, with its collaborative international spirit, is a natural partner for the Google’s worldwide contest. James Gillies, head of CERN’s communication office, said the organization was pleased to be part of the fair.

“The science fair is a great way to engage young people with science, that’s why we decided to get involved,” Gillies said. “It’s not an easy ride. Entrants are being asked to do some serious scientific thinking. I’m much looking forward to seeing the entries.”

To enter, students only need access to the internet. Participants may build their projects by themselves or in teams of three and submit them online. See an example project here.

Unlike a traditional regional science fair, entrants can collaborate or compete with other students from anywhere on the planet. Participants must be between the ages of 13-18

The LEGO Group, National Geographic and Scientific American are also partnering with the Google Science Fair. Other prize opportunities include a trip to the Galapagos Islands on a National Geographic expedition, a virtual internship for one year with the LEGO MINDSTORMS research and development team, and three days in New York learning the ropes at the Scientific American offices.

Registration is open through April 4, 2011. Semi-finalists will be announced in early May.

Click here for more information or to register for the Google Science Fair.

- Cynthia Horwitz

Symmetry Intern

2 Comments »

LHC revs up for a year of new physics

February 25, 2011 | 3:05 pm

An operator monitors the LHC's performance in the CERN Control Center in March 2010. Image courtesy of CERN.

An operator monitors the LHC's performance in the CERN Control Center in March 2010. Image courtesy of CERN.

CERN scientists learned to drive the Large Hadron Collider in 2010. This year, they’re ready to take it to the highway.

Scientists expect to collect about 100 times as much data in 2011 as they did in 2010, said physicist Gustaaf Broijmans of the ATLAS experiment during a webcast for the National Science Foundation. This will give them their first real chance at making new discoveries, he said.

CMS physicist Aaron Dominguez, fellow webcast interviewee, agreed.

“The research program over this past year was essentially to commission the accelerator and the experiments, to make sure that they work and are giving us sensible results,” he said. “We already had some idea in mind of what to expect in terms of the physics being produced.”

On Saturday, Feb. 19, the LHC began circulating particle beams for the first time since the accelerator’s 10-week technical stop. Scientists plan to start colliding protons in the four LHC experiments by mid-March.

Although scientists will not bring the beams to an energy above last year’s record of 3.5 TeV, they plan to increase the number of particles they accelerate, multiplying the number of collisions that take place in the detectors.

Last year, scientists gradually ramped up the number of particles they accelerated over several months while carefully checking the LHC’s procedures and protection systems. They reached a breakthrough in the fall. In October alone, they increased by a factor of 20 the total number of particle collisions the LHC had produced that year.

The machine’s performance so far has looked strikingly similar to its performance just before shutdown. This is quite a feat, considering the sheer complexity of the machine and how long it took scientists to bring it to that point last year, said Mike Lamont, LHC operations group leader.

“The machine looks to have settled down,” Lamont said. “Now we know what we have to do.”

This week, technicians will celebrate another improvement over the last run. Before they could start sending beams through the accelerator, they needed to test the machine’s many magnet circuits. Last year, the tests caused 30-40 magnet quenches, a loss of superconductivity, in the LHC. This year, technicians completed commissioning in about three weeks without quenching a single magnet.

If the LHC continues to run well over the next two years, scientists will be able to test many of their predictions, including the existence of the Higgs boson within its expected mass range. However, they will need to collect a large sample of events to really understand new physics.

“By end of 2012, if the accelerator is performing according to plan, we should have a very good first picture of the standard Higgs boson,” Dominguez said. “But we wouldn’t have a really crisp statistical picture we would need to study its properties.”

At the end of 2012, scientists plan to shut down the accelerator for about a year of upgrades to prepare it to run at full design energy, 7 TeV per beam. That will allow scientists to study further energy ranges and to collect enough information to give physicists a clear view of possible new discoveries.

If this is the year the LHC takes to the particle highway, the next set of runs will be the LHC’s first trip to the Autobahn.

Kathryn Grim

3 Comments »

Power plant generates neutrinos for physics experiment

February 23, 2011 | 3:51 pm

The Chooz Nuclear Power Plant in the Ardennes region of France produces more than just electricity. It produces neutrinos that may help scientists solve some of the biggest mysteries in the universe.

A view of the Chooz power plant highlighting the positions of both Double Chooz detectors. Credit: Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique

A view of the Chooz power plant highlighting the positions of both Double Chooz detectors. Credit: Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique

Neutrinos are electrically neutral and rarely interact with matter. Billions pass through us undetected every second. They come from natural sources, like the sun and cosmic rays. Nuclear plants also produce them as a by-product of fission, making power stations like Chooz a primary location for scientists to set up neutrino experiments.

That’s exactly what the Double Chooz collaboration did.

Herve de Kerret, spokesperson for the now operating Double Chooz neutrino detection experiment, says neutrinos may hold the key to developing physics beyond the current Standard Model. Physicists want to discover the rate at which neutrinos change flavor and the likelihood of each transition. De Kerret explains that studying neutrino behavior could provide answers as to why the universe appears to be composed of matter rather than antimatter. Detector experiments in such places as Japan, Italy, Korea, China and the United States all search for neutrino measurements in complementary ways.

At the Chooz plant, the first of two neutrino detectors for the Double Chooz experiment began collecting data last December. Managed by a collaboration of 38 laboratories and universities from eight countries, the detector observes neutrinos created by the plant’s reactor cores.

A view of the detector during construction. The neutrino target is at the center surrounded by metal cylinder photomultipliers which aid in particle detection. Credit: Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique

A view of the detector during construction. The neutrino target is at the center surrounded by metal cylinder photomultipliers which aid in particle detection. Credit: Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique

The completed detector sits one kilometer from the reactors, looking for electron neutrinos, one of three neutrino flavors. Data from the detectors is sent to a computer center in Lyon that dispatches information to all collaborators. Experimenters measure how many electron neutrinos are missing because they changed to a different flavor.

In 2012, another detector will be installed 400 meters from the reactor core to measure the amount of neutrinos before significant flavor changes. Using two detectors will increase the accuracy of the experiment.

Because detecting neutrinos has its challenges, Double Chooz scientists designed a highly sensitive detector with many control systems in place to ensure the experiment delivers high-quality data.

“The Double Chooz detectors are designed to have the best possible control for systematic errors, adding to the quality of the experiment,” said Kerret, a physicist with the Centre national de la Rechere Scientifique and the Institute National de Physique Cucléaire et de Physique des Particules. “Similar experiments measure neutrinos from several reactors. The abundance of neutrinos from so many sources complicates the comparison of the near and far measurements. The Chooz site only has two reactors, so we have a better idea of how many neutrinos we’re starting with and where we can expect them to come from.”

De Kerret, is especially enthusiastic about the new organic liquid scintillator used at Double Chooz, a product of major research and development efforts. When a neutrino interacts with another particle in the detector, a rare occasion, the scintillator detects the event. The precision of these measurements depends on the purity and stability of the scintillator.

Similar experiments have been conducted at nuclear plants in the past. At the Chooz plant in the 1990s, the first Chooz neutrino experiment produced promising results, giving scientists a tantalizing taste of the measurements they are after. The new Double Chooz experiment promises to close in on those measurements even further.

Experimenters expect to publish results from the first detector as early as this year.

- Cynthia Horwitz

Symmetry Intern

2 Comments »

Chocolat à la particle accelerator

February 14, 2011 | 9:05 am

If your sweetheart gave you chocolate this Valentine’s Day, you have a particle accelerator to thank for its scrumptious taste.

Food scientists used an accelerator-based light source to determine how to avoid the white powder than can form on chocolate known as fat bloom.

Food scientists used an accelerator-based light source to determine how to avoid the white powder than can form on chocolate. (Image courtesy of ESRF)

Using the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, ESRF, in Grenoble, France, scientists from the University of Amsterdam got a close-up view of the molecular structure of chocolate. Their research allowed candy manufacturers to develop new techniques that could avoid the dreaded “fat bloom” –  the white powder that can form on the outside of chocolate.

A basic chocolate recipe consists of roughly one-third cocoa butter, a fat that crystalizes easily. How the butter crystalizes determines the quality of the chocolate. In order to obtain the ideal crystal form, chocolate manufacturers repeatedly heat the butter to a specific temperature and then cool it down. If the chocolate doesn’t reach its ideal crystal state, it will develop the “fat bloom.”

Until recently, food scientists didn’t know what the cocoa crystals looked like and thus didn’t know how to avoid the bloom. But with the help of the accelerator-based light source, scientists were able to use a focused beam of light to see the crystal structure of cocoa butter for the first time. The data helped food scientists understand the melting properties of cocoa butter and therefore how to control the production process. The Dutch machine manufacturer, Duyvis Wiener, used the research to patent a new technology in 2004 for making chocolate without the bloom.

So as you thank your sweetheart today, send some love to particle accelerators too.

Elizabeth Clements

2 Comments »

Particle Physics Photowalk Exhibits Open Around the Globe

February 10, 2011 | 1:21 pm

First there was the Photowalk. Next up was the competition. Then came the calendar, and now there are the exhibits.

This image of the 8Pi nuclear-physics experiment won first place in the global jury competition, and third place in TRIUMF's local competition. The muted black and white image of the 8Pi experiment's inner detectors captures the beauty and symmetry of physics.

This image of the 8Pi nuclear-physics experiment at TRIUMF won first place in the global jury competition. The muted black and white image of the 8Pi experiment's inner detectors captures the symmetry of physics. (Photo: Mikey Enriquez)

Starting Feb. 11, photography exhibits will open in Asia, Europe and North America to showcase images from the first Global Particle Physics Photowalk. Exhibits will open on Feb. 11 at CERN in Switzerland, Fermilab in Illinois and KEK in Japan. Photowalk exhibits will also open in Canada at TRIUMF on Feb. 21 and in Germany, organized by DESY, within the next year.

The Photowalk took place on Aug. 7, 2010. More than 200 amateur photographers received special behind-the-scenes access to tour scientific facilities at CERN, DESY, Fermilab, KEK and TRIUMF.  The participating photographers submitted thousands of photos for local and global competitions. Each photowalk exhibit includes the local winners from that particular laboratory’s competition. All five Photowalk exhibits feature the two global winners, Mikey Enriquez’s photograph of the 8Pi experiment at TRIUMF and Hans-Peter Hildebrandt’s photograph of a wire chamber at DESY.

The InterAction Collaboration, whose members represent particle physics laboratories in Asia, North America and Europe, organized the Photowalk. The collaboration plans to host the next Photowalk in 2012.

To find a Photowalk exhibit near you, visit http://www.interactions.org/cms/?pid=1030491

View the press release

Elizabeth Clements

No Comments »

LHCb event display — decoded!

February 7, 2011 | 12:37 pm

One of the four major experiments built around the collision points of CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, LHCb studies B particles – particles composed of beauty quarks. By detecting and analyzing the decays of millions of Bs, it explores the imperfect symmetry between matter and antimatter, the slight imbalance that allowed matter to survive over antimatter and build the universe we inhabit today.

This walk through the event display of the first B particle detected by LHCb shows how the collision data is analyzed.

LHCb event display. <em>Image courtesy of LHCb collaboration.</em>

LHCb event display. Image courtesy of LHCb collaboration.

All four views of the event display show data from the same collision.

1 -> Collision point: Marks the spot where protons from the 2 beams smash into each other.
2 -> Beamline: The arrows show the paths of the proton beams.
3 -> Vertex Locator
4 -> Tracking detectors
5 -> Magnet
6 -> Ring Imaging Cherenkov detectors
7 -> Calorimeters
8 -> Muon detectors

A -> Top view : Looking down onto LHCb (scale 24m x 12m)

This view gives a complete picture of the collision, showing data from all layers of the LHCb detector. The proton beams collide on the left, and B particles fly out close to the path of the proton beams. This property of B particles is reflected in the design of the experiment: The sub-detectors sit side by side along the beam path, like books on a giant bookshelf.

Dominating the image on the left are the large coils of LHCb’s magnet, shown in white [5]. The magnetic field is perpendicular to the page and curves the paths of charged particles in the plane of the page.

On either side of the magnet are tracking detectors [4] that measure the positions of particles as they pass through. The signals the particles leave behind are shown as crosses. There are no sub-detectors inside the magnet, so the paths of the different particles spraying out from the collision are reconstructed in a sophisticated version of “connect the dots” using data from all the LHCb detector’s layers.

Particles from the collision also pass through the Ring Imaging Cherenkov detectors [6], which are used for particle identification. They work by measuring emissions of Cherenkov radiation. This phenomenon, often compared to the sonic boom produced by an aircraft breaking the sound barrier, occurs when a charged particle passes through a certain medium (in this case, a dense gas) faster than light does. As it travels, the particle emits a cone of light, which the Cherenkov detectors reflect onto an array of sensors using mirrors.

Then, particles are stopped by the calorimeters [7], and the energy they deposit is represented in the event display by histograms. The red bars represent the energy of lighter particles (such as photons and electrons), while the blue bars show the energy of the group of mostly heavier particles (such as protons).

The position of the muon detectors [8], furthest from the collision point on the right, is shown by the vertical green lines. The tracks left by the two muons created in this collision are colored in magenta.

B -> Along the beam: Looking straight through the collision point (scale 1m x 0.5m)

This view shows data only from LHCb’s two tracking detectors [4] and the Vertex Locator (VELO) [3]. The curved tracks show how the strong magnetic field affects the direction of charged particles as they spray out from the collision. Some particles are only seen in the very central layer, the VELO, whose main job is to identify the primary interaction point, or vertex, where the collision occurred and also any secondary vertices where short-lived particles decayed. The VELO is very close to the collision point – a mere 8 millimeters from the point of impact.

C -> Where it all happens: The collision region (scale 0.7mm x 10mm)

Here, there are no data points showing actual signals from the sub-detectors. Rather, this is a reconstruction of the innermost region surrounding the collision point, using information gleaned from all of the detector layers. This is where the exciting physics happens.

The image has been stretched in the vertical direction to make it easier for our eyes to decipher – particles spray out from collisions so close to the beamline that without changing the scale, different particle tracks could not be separated by our eyes.

The exact collision point is clearly identified as the point of origin of almost all the lines, labelled “primary vertex.” However the two muons (the magenta tracks labelled μ+ and μ-) originate from a point a few millimeters away, the “secondary vertex.” This indicates that other particles were created in the collision and that they decayed before reaching the first layer of detectors, at the point where the two muons emerge.

The combined mass of the two muons corresponds to the mass of a very short-lived particle called a Jpsi (whose path is represented as a short green dash). The Jpsi was created at the same time as a kaon (red track) at a point close to — but not exactly — the muons’ vertex. The Kaon survived longer than the Jpsi and was detected in several of the layers of LHCb detectors.

Working backwards, each time comparing the direction of the momentum of the different particles, their masses and energies, the full story emerges. A B particle (orange track) was created in the collision and, after a few millimeters decayed into a kaon (red) and a Jpsi (green), which in turn decayed into two muons (magenta).

— Emma Sanders & Thomas Ruf

Other posts in this series include: CMS event display — decoded!, ATLAS event display — decoded!, ALICE event display — decoded! and LHC Page 1 — decoded!

For visitors to CERN, a new photo book telling the story of the LHCb experiment is available from the shop at CERN’s reception and from the CERN library.

Guest author

2 Comments »

Particle physicist lends skills to planet hunt

February 4, 2011 | 2:11 pm

Artist's illustration of Kepler spacecraft. Credit: NASA/ Kepler Mission/ Wendy Stenzel.

Artist's illustration of Kepler spacecraft. Credit: NASA/ Kepler Mission/ Wendy Stenzel.

You don’t normally think of high-energy physicists working with NASA to find planets that humans could live on. Working on the Large Hadron Collider or dark-energy-seeking telescopes, yeah, but, planet hunting? Not so much.

Yet, Jason Steffen, an astrophysicist at Fermilab, is a long-time member of NASA’s Kepler Mission and its only practicing  particle physicist. He helped make possible the mission’s discoveries announced Wednesday of a six-planet solar system 2,000 light years away, tits first Earth-sized planet candidate, and the first such candidate that potentially could support human life.

It’s one small step for Steffen and his Kepler collaborators and one giant step for dreamers everywhere.

“In one generation we have gone from extraterrestrial planets being a mainstay of science fiction, to the present, where Kepler has helped turn science fiction into today’s reality,” says NASA administrator Charles Bolden upon announcing the data release.

The Kepler spacecraft-mounted telescope, 11 million miles from Earth,  scans the sky to find, for the first time, distant life-sustaining planets the size of Earth.  Telescopes can’t directly spot planets smaller than Jupiter, but Kepler uses starlight to indirectly see smaller planets. Planets that could potentially sustain life fall into a Goldilocks-like “habitable zone,” orbiting the perfect distance from a star like our sun so as to not be too hot or too cold. Often these planets’ orbits cross close in front of a star, or “transit,” making them visible through the blinking out of the stars’ light.  By measuring the brightness change of a star as a planet passes in front of it, as well as  the time between these transits, scientists can tell the planet’s size, orbit, and estimated temperature.

But the closeness to the star that allows Kepler to “see” the planet also often makes it too hot for life. The more distant planets outside Kepler’s view hold a greater chance of being just right to sustain life. Kepler has difficulty spotting these planets because of orbit cycles that are longer than the time frame of the released data or because they do not transit stars.

That’s where Steffen comes in.

Jason Steffen

Jason Steffen

“We are sensitive to planets that Kepler can’t see directly,” says Steffen of the analysis team he leads. “That is where it gets interesting.”

He helped pioneer a search method that can detect distant planets more than 600 times smaller than Jupiter and out of range of Kepler‘s telescope. He uses computerized mathematical procedures, called algorithms, including many that are commonplace to particle physics, to probe deeper into space in the area around a planet Kepler sees to find planets in that often cooler, more habitable zone.

This is done by studying the amount of time it takes a planet to complete its orbit past a star. Deviations from a constant orbit time  indicate the presence of some additional unseen planet whose gravitational pull is changing the orbit speed of the observed planet. This technique is used to confirm that distant images seen by the Kepler telescope are planets and not pairs eclipsing binary stars blurred by the telescope to resemble an object of planet size.

Steffen expects to look at hundreds of planetary systems during the mission’s 3 ½ years. By looking at patterns in the times it takes planets to transit, scientists could fill in some blanks about how planetary systems form with relation to their distance from a sun.

The discoveries announced Wednesday are part of several hundred planet candidates identified in new Kepler mission science data release. The findings increase the number of planet candidates identified by Kepler to date to 1,235. Of these, 68 are approximately Earth-size; 288 are super-Earth-size; 662 are Neptune-size; 165 are the size of Jupiter; and 19 are larger than Jupiter. Of the 54 new planet candidates found in the habitable zone, five are near Earth-sized. The remaining 49 habitable-zone candidates range from super-Earth size — up to twice the size of Earth — to larger than Jupiter.

The findings are based on the results of observations conducted from May 12 to Sept. 17, 2009, of more than 156,000 stars in Kepler’s field of view, which covers approximately 1/400th of the sky.

Based on this large data sample “….it turns out that close to 20 percent of all stars are orbited by
planets, meaning that a significant fraction of the stars in the sky are orbited by alien worlds,” says Tim Brown, Kepler co-investigator and physics professor at the University of California Santa Barbara, in a press release.

Just as Kepler collaborators look  for a planet that is just right for habitation, the group also needed just the right skill set to expand its search reach. Steffen happened to be one of the only people in the world versed in that area of research because of his graduate degree work in transit timing variations.

NASA to note and asked him to join the Kepler mission as a participating scientist, collaborators drawn from outside the normal NASA research field to to enable the team to more effectively execute the mission’s science program.

Steffen and his thesis advisor Eric Agol, associate professor of astronomy at the University of Washington, fine-tuned this method of tracking fluctuations in the orbits of planets, making it unexpectedly useful for short-time mission such as Kepler’s planet hunting.

Scientists had tracked orbit fluctuations before but always on the time scale of comparing  many thousands of orbit cycles during the course of many decades. Using smaller data sets taken during shorter periods of time seemed pointless because they generated such small effects–until Steffen and Agol came along.

By introducing a  new tracking method, they reduced the time needed to identify these hard-to-find planets to a year with only a dozen or two orbit cycles.  Matt Holman, an astronomer with the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, had also been focusing on the same problem. The two joined together to adapt their tracking methods, along with help from colleagues across the country, for the Kepler exoplanet hunt.

This work with exoplanets doesn’t have direct applications to high-energy physics or Steffen’s other work at Fermilab on chameleons, axion particles, and holographic noise. However, particle physics uses many of the same mathematical algorithms in experiments and there is no telling whether Steffen’s technique could become useful in that field in the future.

“It’s fair to say I can cannibalize the components of the algorithm for future projects,” Steffen says.

–Tona Kunz

For more information:

Kepler mission website

Kepler discovers new planetary system press release

Kepler finds Earth-size planet in habitable zone press release

Kepler public data website

Kepler search range. Credit: NASA.

Kepler search range. Credit: NASA.

Tona Kunz

1 Comment »

Giant virus, tiny protein crystals show X-ray laser’s potential

February 2, 2011 | 5:06 pm

 SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory’s iconic linear accelerator — nearly two miles long, and for many years the longest building in the world –  no longer speeds electrons toward high-energy collisions.  But it’s still going strong:  One-third of the linac now feeds electrons into the Linac Coherent Light Source, which opened in 2009 as the world’s most powerful X-ray free electron laser.  The first biological studies there demonstrate the LCLS’s potential for groundbreaking research. Here’s the SLAC press release:

X-ray diffraction pattern of a single Mimivirus particle imaged at the LCLS. In this study, the X-ray pulse lasted a millionth of a billionth of a second and heated the virus to 100,000 degrees Celsius, but not before this image was obtained. (Image courtesy Tomas Ekeberg, Uppsala University.)

X-ray diffraction pattern of a single Mimivirus particle imaged at the LCLS. In this study, the X-ray pulse lasted a millionth of a billionth of a second and heated the virus to 100,000 degrees Celsius, but not before this image was obtained. (Image courtesy Tomas Ekeberg, Uppsala University.)

Menlo Park, Calif. Two studies (here and here) published Feb. 3 in Nature demonstrate how the unique capabilities of the world’s first hard X-ray free-electron laser—the Linac Coherent Light Source, located at the Department of Energy’s SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory—could revolutionize the study of life. 

In one study, an international research team used the LCLS to demonstrate a shortcut for determining the 3-D structures of proteins. The laser’s brilliant pulses of X-ray light pulled structural data from tiny protein nanocrystals, avoiding the need to use large protein crystals that can be difficult or impossible to prepare. This could lop years off the structural analysis of some proteins and allow scientists to decipher tens of thousands of others that are out of reach today, including many involved in infectious disease.

In a separate paper, the same team reported making the first single-shot images of intact viruses, paving the way for snapshots and movies of molecules, viruses and live microbes in action.

Led by Henry Chapman of the Center for Free-Electron Laser Science at the German national laboratory DESYand Janos Hajdu of Sweden’s Uppsala University, the team of more than 80 researchers from 21 institutions performed these experiments in December 2009, just two months after the LCLS opened for research.  Their studies are the first to demonstrate the power and potential of the LCLS for biology.

“The LCLS beam is a billion times brighter than previous X-ray sources, and so intense it can cut through steel,” Chapman said.  “Yet these incredible X-ray bursts are used with surgical, microscopic precision and  exquisite control, and this is opening whole new realms of scientific possibilities,” including the ability to observe atoms moving and chemical bonds forming and breaking in real time.

The LCLS Atomic, Molecular and Optical instrument hutch where the experiments were performed, with the CAMP chamber at center-right.

The LCLS Atomic, Molecular and Optical instrument hutch where the experiments were performed, with the CAMP chamber at center-right.

Outrunning a laser blast

In the experiments, scientists sprayed viruses or nanocrystals into the path of the X-ray beam and zapped them with bursts of laser light. Each strobe-like laser pulse is so brief —a few millionths of a billionth of a second long—that it gathers all the information needed to make an image before the sample explodes.  

Hajdu had proposed this method nearly a decade earlier.  Researchers at Arizona State University, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, SLAC and Uppsala spent years developing specialized equipment for injecting samples into the beam,  and Germany’s Max Planck Advanced Study Group brought in a 10-ton, $7 million instrument called CAMP to record every single photon of data with a fast, ultra-sensitive X-ray camera for later analysis.

 Tests at DESY and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory showed that the concept worked at lower X-ray energies.  “But as you go to higher energies, can you still outrun the damage?” said team member Michael Bogan, a SLAC staff scientist and principal investigator at the PULSE Institute for Ultrafast Energy Science, jointly located at SLAC and Stanford University.  The answer, he said, was yes:  “The physics still holds.”

A big payoff from tiny crystals

A reconstructed image of the Photosystem I complex. (Image courtesy Raimund Fromme, Arizona State University.)

A reconstructed image of the Photosystem I complex. (Image courtesy Raimund Fromme, Arizona State University.)

The protein structure experiments were led by Chapman and Arizona State’s John Spence and Petra Fromme. They chose as their target Photosystem I, a biological factory in plant cells that converts sunlight to energy during photosynthesis. It’s one of an important class of proteins known as membrane proteins that biologists and drug developers are eager to understand better.

 Embedded in cell membranes, these proteins control traffic in and out of the cell and serve as docking points for infectious agents and disease-fighting drugs; in fact, they are the targets of more than 60 percent of the drugs on the market. Yet scientists know the structures of only six of the estimated 30,000 membrane proteins in the human body, given the difficulty of turning them into big crystals for conventional X-ray analysis.  

To get around this bottleneck, the researchers squirted millions of nanocrystals containing copies of Photosystem I across the X-ray beam. Laser pulses hit the crystals at various angles and scattered into the detector, forming the patterns needed to reconstitute images.  Each crystal immediately vaporized, but by the time the next pulse arrived another crystal had moved into the bull’s eye.

 The team combined 10,000 of the three million snapshots they took to come up with a good match for the known molecular structure of Photosystem I. 

“I attended several meetings this summer where this work was presented and I was extraordinarily excited by it,” Michael Wiener of the University of Virginia, who was not involved in the research, said of the results.  He leads one of nine institutes set up by the National Institutes of Health to decipher the structures of membrane proteins. “Preparation of these nanocrystals is likely to be very, very much easier than the larger crystals used to date,” Wiener said, leaving scientists more time and money to find out how these important biomolecules work.

 The team is scheduled to return to the LCLS this month to repeat the experiments with X-ray laser pulses that are much faster and deliver four times as much energy as they did in the initial round.  If the physics still hold, future images should capture the extraordinarily complex structure of Photosystem I in atom-by-atom detail.

Researchers John Spence (Arizona State), Henry Chapman (DESY), Inger Andersson (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) and Janos Hajdu (Uppsala University) at the LCLS. (Photo by R. Bruce Doak, Arizona State University.)

Researchers John Spence (Arizona State), Henry Chapman (DESY), Inger Andersson (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) and Janos Hajdu (Uppsala University) at the LCLS. (Photo by R. Bruce Doak, Arizona State University.)

 Portraits of a virus

 For the second experiment, the team went a step beyond nanocrystals to no crystals at all.  Led by Hajdu, they made single-shot portraits of individual virus particles. These snapshots are a step toward eventually producing stop-action movies of chemical changes taking place in molecules and within living cells.

 Biologists have long dreamed of making images of viruses, whole microbes and living cells without freezing, slicing or otherwise disturbing them.  This is one of the goals of the LCLS, and the researchers tested its capabilities on Mimivirus, the world’s largest known virus, which infects amoebas.

 Of the hundreds of Mimiviruses hit by the LCLS beam, two produced enough data to allow scientists to reconstitute their images.  The images show the 20-sided structure of the Mimi’s outer coat and an area of denser material inside, which may represent its genetic material.  Shorter, brighter pulses focused to a smaller area should greatly improve the resolution of these images to reveal details as small as one nanometer, the team wrote in their Feb. 3 Nature report.

 Getting a detailed picture of the internal structure of an individual virus “would be a great achievement,” said team member Jean-Michel Claverie, director of the Structural & Genomic Information Lab in Marseille and one of the scientists who discovered Mimi’s viral nature.

 “This is a brand-new way to look at a biological object,” he said. “This will allow us to address not only the questions related to the internal structure of the virus, but its intrinsic variability from one individual virus particle to the next—a microscopic variability that might play a fundamental role in evolution.”

The team returned to the LCLS in January to look at the Mimivirus at X-ray wavelengths that should maximize the amount of contrast and detail in the images.  They will be analyzing the results in the months to come.

 SLAC Director Persis Drell, who sat in a control room packed with scientists as raw data from the two experiments came in, said the experience was thrilling—and so is the potential for biology and medicine.

 “This first data and these first papers are really just the first view of a new research frontier,” she said. “They represent a turning point for the LCLS, demonstrating new technologies that will be great steps forward.”

Press Release

No Comments »