<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomically large lenses measure the age and size of the universe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/01/astronomically-large-lenses-measure-the-age-and-size-of-the-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/01/astronomically-large-lenses-measure-the-age-and-size-of-the-universe/</link>
	<description>extra dimensions of particle physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanard</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/01/astronomically-large-lenses-measure-the-age-and-size-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-166474</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=6773#comment-166474</guid>
		<description>I have a question:  if the universe is estimated at 13.5 billion years old, then how is it possible that a galaxy or star can be calculated to be 12 billion light years or in one Hubble video comment as far as 15 billion light years away?  Mathematically that poses a serious problem.  The universe expanding from the big bang would have to be at least older than the time it would take to disperse the matter of the universe to all of its furthest points. I calculate 12 billion light years as 12 billion x the length of a light year.  Is that not accurate?  though my calculator and math skills are somewhat limited, how is this possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question:  if the universe is estimated at 13.5 billion years old, then how is it possible that a galaxy or star can be calculated to be 12 billion light years or in one Hubble video comment as far as 15 billion light years away?  Mathematically that poses a serious problem.  The universe expanding from the big bang would have to be at least older than the time it would take to disperse the matter of the universe to all of its furthest points. I calculate 12 billion light years as 12 billion x the length of a light year.  Is that not accurate?  though my calculator and math skills are somewhat limited, how is this possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaz Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2010/03/01/astronomically-large-lenses-measure-the-age-and-size-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-49490</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaz Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=6773#comment-49490</guid>
		<description>Love the video. Could enough ice slow down light?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the video. Could enough ice slow down light?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

