I still want to see evidence of proper scientific research. Like a college lab report? I love reading into the wealth of data through the eyes of a rhetorician once more.

Lets see what happens next. Also, Let us not get too excited. We haven’t developed a way to “capture” this dark matter abstract particle. We need to learn how you can hold on to this matter and utilize it as an energy source, or even possibly a “potential energy reactor” (whereby the given flux from the “anti-matter” gives enough potentiated energy to run a steam engine)

These things are all possible through DarkMatter… Imagine the possibilities.

You are both certainly correct that the construction and operation of the Large Hadron Collider and its experiments is a truly international effort, involving an estimated 10,000 people from 60 countries.

That said, Symmetry Breaking is the blog of Symmetry Magazine, which is published jointly by Fermilab and SLAC, two national laboratories funded by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy. Thus I don’t believe it was inappropriate for my article to emphasize the U.S. contributions to the LHC project. Those contributions have been and continue to be substantial, especially to the two large experiments ATLAS and CMS (more detailed information and statistics are available at http://uslhc.us).

For more on the institutions and people behind Symmetry Magazine, see its About page: http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/cms/?pid=1000001

However, as far as understanding formation of matter, as we know it, it’s an entirely different story!! First, there’s absolutely no way to recreate the very same environment like at time of Big Bang or even what we could call “present time”, for no particle collider has dark matter.

We cannot simply ignore the absence of dark matter in such collisions if we want to understand more accurately how particle combinations take place. Dark matter is the “tissue” where all stellar objetcs are embeded in (or on). For instance, what if dark matter (proved mathematically existing) somehow drains, transfer or absorbs, entire or partially, enegry resulted from the collision?

Second, there is no way to prove (yet) whether Earth’s gravitational field is negligible or not in regards to these particles behavior, before, during and after collision.

Last, but not least, all spacial explosions observed so far were a core-to-out event, not opposite direction objects launched one agaisnt the other.

I going to take a break here. Maybe I am already saying too much. But some of you, clearly laymen, make no mistake, LHC WILL bring great advances in medicine, agricluture and energy.

Whether commom people will benefit from these advances is another 500.

Best to all of you!

My point is this, experiments have shown us that when Light is observed, especially when it knows it is being looked upon, will not reveal itself. No matter the reasoning for knowledge of it.

Hence the four experiments, four different results, use eight tests get eight results and so on…
We as a culture are not ready to advance ourselves this fast, we have already created to much without ability to WISELY use such resources.

We will not find answers out there, not until we answer the ones in here, and in order to do that we all must ask the same question, together !
Sincerely,
Life

What is extremely curious to me is WHY Katie Yurkewicz would write so proudly of the US in the LHC’s success.

@ Alexander Nahhas:

The 4 experiments are designed to look at different aspects of particle physics. Also, the more data they have to search for the Higgs Boson the the more conclusive the results will be. I hardly think that collecting experimental data is idiotic, especially considering the immense complexity of the LHC and what they hope to prove.