<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q&amp;As on Higgs search article in Parade magazine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2009/07/27/qas-on-higgs-search-article-in-parade-magazine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2009/07/27/qas-on-higgs-search-article-in-parade-magazine/</link>
	<description>extra dimensions of particle physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas M Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2009/07/27/qas-on-higgs-search-article-in-parade-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-21572</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas M Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=4373#comment-21572</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh&quot; - that explains it...just kidding. Thanks for your information. based on this, it seems the &quot;Super-String&quot; Theory is not valid to accomplish what Einstein was sure was there, that is, an &quot;E=MC2&quot;-like formula to connect the large and small things of life. The &quot;unified(?)&quot; theory?

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh&#8221; &#8211; that explains it&#8230;just kidding. Thanks for your information. based on this, it seems the &#8220;Super-String&#8221; Theory is not valid to accomplish what Einstein was sure was there, that is, an &#8220;E=MC2&#8243;-like formula to connect the large and small things of life. The &#8220;unified(?)&#8221; theory?</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Riesselmann</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2009/07/27/qas-on-higgs-search-article-in-parade-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-21515</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Riesselmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=4373#comment-21515</guid>
		<description>Tom,

Here is what a theorist at Fermilab has to say about &quot;Higgs vs. string theory:&quot;

It is true that in string theory what we call &quot;particles&quot; are actually bits of string, and if the string is stretched and vibrating then the particle will seem to get a mass from the stretching and vibrational energy of the string. However particles that get mass this way are all superheavy; they probably have masses ~a thousand trillion times that of a proton.

So we believe that all the particles that we have discovered, that is, all the particles of the Standard Model, are actually strings that are neither stretched nor vibrating (we call these zero modes). The usual Higgs mechanism is supposed to explain their masses. The Higgs itself would also be one of the &quot;zero modes&quot; of the superstrings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>Here is what a theorist at Fermilab has to say about &#8220;Higgs vs. string theory:&#8221;</p>
<p>It is true that in string theory what we call &#8220;particles&#8221; are actually bits of string, and if the string is stretched and vibrating then the particle will seem to get a mass from the stretching and vibrational energy of the string. However particles that get mass this way are all superheavy; they probably have masses ~a thousand trillion times that of a proton.</p>
<p>So we believe that all the particles that we have discovered, that is, all the particles of the Standard Model, are actually strings that are neither stretched nor vibrating (we call these zero modes). The usual Higgs mechanism is supposed to explain their masses. The Higgs itself would also be one of the &#8220;zero modes&#8221; of the superstrings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas M Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2009/07/27/qas-on-higgs-search-article-in-parade-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-21514</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas M Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 23:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=4373#comment-21514</guid>
		<description>Kurt - where does &quot;String Theory&quot; fit into all this? From the description of the &quot;Higgs Field&quot;, it would seem that that field does what String Theory proponents believe the energy strings do. 

Tom Mason
Aliso Viejo, CA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kurt &#8211; where does &#8220;String Theory&#8221; fit into all this? From the description of the &#8220;Higgs Field&#8221;, it would seem that that field does what String Theory proponents believe the energy strings do. </p>
<p>Tom Mason<br />
Aliso Viejo, CA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurt Riesselmann</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2009/07/27/qas-on-higgs-search-article-in-parade-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-21505</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurt Riesselmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=4373#comment-21505</guid>
		<description>John,

Good catch. Yes, the six leptons are electron, muon, tau, and electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino. The three neutrinos have no electric charge, the other three do.

Kurt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,</p>
<p>Good catch. Yes, the six leptons are electron, muon, tau, and electron neutrino, muon neutrino and tau neutrino. The three neutrinos have no electric charge, the other three do.</p>
<p>Kurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Young</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2009/07/27/qas-on-higgs-search-article-in-parade-magazine/comment-page-1/#comment-21494</link>
		<dc:creator>John Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=4373#comment-21494</guid>
		<description>The article would have been even better if the author had not written, incorrectly, &quot;... six uncharged [sic] particles called leptons ...&quot;.

If a journalist writes, or a magazine publishes, an article on physics, it might be a good idea to have it reviewed by a physicist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article would have been even better if the author had not written, incorrectly, &#8220;&#8230; six uncharged [sic] particles called leptons &#8230;&#8221;.</p>
<p>If a journalist writes, or a magazine publishes, an article on physics, it might be a good idea to have it reviewed by a physicist!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

