Higgs turning up everywhere, this time in paint

March 4, 2009 | 10:21 am

The portrait of Peter Higgs is on display at Edinburgh University's School of Informatics. Photograph: Ken Currie

The portrait of Peter Higgs is on display at the University of Edinburgh's School of Informatics. Photograph: Ken Currie

It seems that Peter Higgs, despite his known aversion to publicity is turning up everywhere. Of course the potential discovery of the particle in the next few years by either/both of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN and the Tevatron at Fermilab is bringing a lot more attention to him, and a little to the other theorists, such as  Guralnik, Hagen, Kibble, Brout, and Englert, who also developed the ideas behind a mass-giving spontaneously symmetry broken quantum field and its manifestation as a particle, now known as the Higgs boson. (Yep, that sounds scary because it gets technical.)

But Higgs the man seems to turn up in all kinds of places and lots of people have stories about where and how they met the man. I ran into him in at a function in a museum in the Hunterian Museum at the University of Glasgow over a decade ago, while Lauren, one of the symmetry interns, used to make him his sandwich in a cafe most days when she spent time in Glasgow. (Tell us your story of meeting Higgs in the comments below.)

Now the man has appeared in a different way in the School of Informatics at the University of Edinburgh, but in the form of a painting by one of Scotland’s best-known artists, Ken Currie. The painting has Currie’s distinguishing ethereal style Currie but, from what I can tell of low-res photographs, it seems a lot cheerier than most of his work. I think it’s a great piece with a lot of information packed into the painting for those who know a little about the Higgs particle. I’m keen to hear what you think of it so let me know in the comments.

David Harris

4 Comments »

Simulating cosmic evolution

March 3, 2009 | 8:12 pm

A still from a simulated animation of a Type 1a supernova. Click image to see a low-res version of the animation (avi format). Image and animation courtesy of flash.uchicago.edu.

A still from a simulated animation of a Type 1a supernova. Click image to see a low-res version of the animation (avi format). Image and animation courtesy of flash.uchicago.edu.

What is matter? Where did it come from? What is the future of the universe? To answer these compelling questions, astrophysicists are trying to learn more about the physics of the big bang, and the origin of structure–the formation of the initial clumps of matter from the primordial soup. Computational tools and resources are indispensable to pursuing these fundamental questions.

Robert Rosner, director of Argonne National Laboratory and professor at the University of Chicago, spoke Friday, February 13 at the AAAS conference in Chicago about the role of simulation in studying the origins and evolution of the universe.

Direct observation of the cosmos has uncovered a host of facts. For example, the universe is expanding from the big bang and its expansion is accelerating. But observation will only take us so far, said Rosner. Scientists need to use theory to construct possible ‘scenarios’, and test them via experiments at particle accelerator laboratories and via computer simulations. Rosner presented simulated animations from a couple of important projects as examples of the use of simulation in astrophysics.

The Millennium Simulation Project is helping to clarify the physical processes underlying the buildup of real galaxies and black holes. It has traced the evolution of the matter distribution in a cubic region of the universe over 2 billion light-years on a side. According to its Web site, this simulation kept the principal supercomputer at the Max Planck Society’s Leibniz Supercomputing Center in Garching, Germany busy for more than a month.

The ASC/Alliances Center for Astrophysical Thermonuclear Flashes at the University of Chicago runs simulations to solve the problem of thermonuclear explosions on the surfaces of compact stars. Their simulations of Type Ia supernovae, exploding white dwarf stars, have shown that an internal flame ‘bubble’ emerges at a point on the stellar surface, leading to surface waves that converge at the opposite point, and causing a shock and subsequent detonation of the entire star. Previously, scientists thought that the original flame would directly transition to a detonation. Based only on well-known physical processes, these simulations exemplify the potential of numerical simulations for scientific discovery.

Robert Rosner. Image courtesy of Lloyd DeGrane.

Robert Rosner. Image courtesy of Lloyd DeGrane.

Rosner noted that computing is moving towards the exascale (processing power of over 1018 FLOPS). He compared the current transition in computational methods and capabilities to the early 1990s when scientists moved from vector machines (such as the Cray) to massively parallel computers. At that time, the challenge was to modify existing codes optimized for vector machines to run efficiently on massively parallel machines; the new challenge is that of resource diversity across the network–how to construct algorithms that are flexible enough to efficiently exploit a variety of resource types, such as multi-core and heterogeneous processor computer architectures.

“For instance, we’re learning that for heterogeneous systems the MPI programming model, a standard for message passing between distinct tasks running concurrently on a computer, may not work well,” Rosner said. “Do we go back to multithreading and OpenMP from the early 90s? Are new algorithms needed? We may well have to change the way we program once again; and given our huge investments in existing codes, this will be a huge challenge.”

“The future is stunningly exciting,” said Rosner. “When we get to exascale computing we can capture the visible universe and we will understand how the observed structure came to be. We’ll be able to reach more reliable conclusions about the fate of our universe.”

by Anne Heavey

This story first appeared in International Science Grid This Week.

Guest author

1 Comment »

A handy guide to grids and clouds

March 2, 2009 | 11:02 am

A chart in the new GridBriefing compares grids and clouds

A chart in the new GridBriefing compares grids and clouds

For those interested in the relative merits of grid computing vs. cloud computing for handling humongous amounts of data, GridTalk has a new four-page briefing that offers a neat summary. It’s written by Cristy Burne, former editor of International Science Grid This Week (thanks, iSGTW, for the tip!) and starts with the basics: Just what are we talking about here?

Both grids and clouds are very large collections of computers. In grids, such as the Open Science Grid in the United States, the computers are owned and shared by multiple users.  A cloud, in contrast, is generally owned by one entity–for instance, Amazon or IBM–that leases computing time to users.

There’s been a lot of discussion about which system is the better choice for particle physics and other data-intensive science. In October we pointed to an analysis by Ignacio Martín Llorente of the Distributed Systems Architecture Research Group in Madrid arguing that the two technologies are different and complementary.

The new briefing has a chart comparing the two approaches–who offers them? how do they work? what are the benefits and drawbacks?–as well as brief commentaries from a variety of experts and links to more information.

Speaking of more info, here are links to symmetry articles on grid computing:

The Grid in 60 seconds
Meet the Grid (An introductory feature)
What is the Grid? (A conversation between some leading particle physics computer scientists)
Sciences on the Grid (Case studies of science being performed on existing grids)

Glennda Chui

1 Comment »