The latest from the LHC

January 31, 2009 | 11:29 am

CERN has posted the next in its series of LHC repair updates. After it was determined that the likely cause of the September 19, 2008 incident was a faulty splice, CERN checked the rest of the LHC for warning signs of similar problems in other superconducting magnets. One magnet that was identified as a candidate for potential problems was removed from the LHC two weeks ago, opened up and inspected, and it has been confirmed that there is a lack of solder on the splice joint in question.

Based on these results, one more of the LHC’s eight sectors will now be warmed up so that another dipole magnet can be removed for inspection. CERN states that the warmup of this additional sector will not affect the overall restart schedule. Work to repair and replace magnets damaged in the original incident continues; nine magnets have now been replaced in the LHC tunnel.

Katie Yurkewicz

1 Comment »

30 years of US-China high-energy physics cooperation

January 31, 2009 | 3:24 am

W. K. H. Panofsky (left) and Zhang Wenyu at SLAC, November 12, 1972. Photo: SLAC archives

W. K. H. Panofsky (left) and Zhang Wenyu at SLAC, November 12, 1972. Photo: SLAC Archives

Thirty years ago today, on January 31, 1979, the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) signed a formal agreement to cooperate in the field of high-energy physics. In the period leading up to the signing, informal cooperation had been blossoming, encouraged in part by the 1969 findings of the US Atomic Energy Commission’s High Energy Physics Advisory Panel (HEPAP), and in part by the growing enthusiasm for high-energy physics (HEP) of the PRC science community.

The 1969 HEPAP, chaired by Professor Victor Weisskopf (director-general of CERN, 1961-1966), stated unequivocally that

Scientific contacts and collaborations serve the cause of peace and the improvement of relations between nations.

In addition, the Panel put forth the then-novel idea that HEP is, for a variety of reasons, particularly well-suited to international collaboration.

First People's Republic of China visitors to SLAC, led by Zhang Wenyu. (Pictured behind SLAC Director W. K. H. Pief Panofsky, with Technical Division Director Dick Neal). In foreground of photo, Research Division Director Joe Ballam greets a member of the delegation. Photo: SLAC Archive

First People's Republic of China visitors to SLAC, led by Zhang Wenyu. (Pictured behind SLAC Director W. K. H. Pief Panofsky, with Technical Division Director Dick Neal). In foreground of photo, Research Division Director Joe Ballam greets a member of the delegation. Photo: SLAC Archives

The Panel reasoned that, because of its fundamental nature, HEP assists countries in the development of technology; because it is basic and not applied science, it requires fewer security restrictions; because its instrumentation is expensive, there are economies of scale to be realized through international partnerships in HEP; and, because senior staff in HEP in many countries were at that time in good communication with their own governments, they could provide a “useful channel” for the exchange of ideas among national leaders.

Prior to the 1979 formal US-PRC agreement, there had been international collaborations involving US laboratories, but there had never been any major joint construction projects, nor direct US participation in HEP development activities in other countries.

At that time, enthusiasm for HEP was high in the PRC: they had no major HEP facility, but they were determined to build one. Zhang Wenyu, a US-educated physicist and former University of Minnesota faculty member, visited SLAC in November 1972 in his role as a senior member of the PRC’s Institute of Atomic Energy. His mission was to explore the best approach for China to enter the world of accelerator-based HEP. Zhang followed up his individual visit by leading a delegation of PRC scientists on a tour of US physics labs in 1973. Subsequent visits back and forth between delegations from both countries led to the historic 1979 agreement, signed by President Carter’s Secretary of Energy James Schlesinger and PRC Vice Premier Fang Yi.

Chinese delegation, on bus tour of SLAC, at East Survey Tower overlooking the research yard. Photo: SLAC Archives

Chinese delegation, on bus tour of SLAC, at East Survey Tower overlooking the research yard. Photo: SLAC Archives

In the joint press communiqué issued for the occasion, the two parties affirmed that:

The two sides consider that the differences in their social systems should not constitute an obstacle to their strengthening friendly relations and cooperation. They are resolved to work toward this end, and they firmly believe that such cooperation is in the interest of their two peoples and also that of peace and stability in the world and in the Asia-Pacific region in particular.

As recounted by W. K. H. “Pief” Panofsky in his memoir, the first major product of this agreement was the successful construction of the Beijing Electron-Positron Collider (BEPC I).

Delegation from the People's Republic of China, 1979. Photo: SLAC Archives

Delegation from the People's Republic of China, 1979. Photo: SLAC Archives

Jean Deken

No Comments »

South Carolina gets its own ATLAS

January 30, 2009 | 6:24 am

Kristofoletti paints an ATLAS mural in South Carolina. Photo on flickr by Kristofoletti.

Kristofoletti paints an ATLAS mural in South Carolina. Photo on flickr by Kristofoletti.

If you’re a fan of the Large Hadron Collider, you might see something familiar when driving around the streets of historic Charleston, South Carolina. Mural artist Josef Kristofoletti spent three weeks in September 2008, just after the LHC’s highly publicized launch and subsequent shutdown, painting a representation of the ATLAS detector on the wall of the Redux Contemporary Art Center.

Kristofoletti and his wife Amy created this time-lapse video of the mural’s creation. You can also see a set of still images.

A lifelong fan of science, and a fan of CERN since an introductory physics class in college, Kristofoletti wanted to create something timely and CERN-related for his part of the exhibit The Sun Machine Is Coming Down.

“What got me painting murals was working in Italy for a couple of years and seeing the murals of the Renaissance. The subject of most of those works is religious mythology. When I think about the LHC it always seems like an unprecedented cathedral of science. I thought this would be a modern-day version of a Renaissance mural.”

As with the creation of the real ATLAS detector, Kristofoletti faced a few setbacks along the way. Approached by a policeman who thought he was covering the wall with graffitti, he explained what he was doing and that the painting was of one of the particle detectors at CERN. The policeman had heard of CERN and the LHC, and let the painting continue, but not without a quick discussion of much-publicized doomsday scenarios.

Kristofoletti arranged for the head of the physics department of the College of Charleston to attend the exhibit opening and give a brief introduction to the LHC. “People enjoyed having something that touched on both art and science,” he said. “Humans have always tried to find out where we came from and where things originate, and I think that’s why this captures people’s imagination.”


ANGEL OF THE HIGGS BOSON from josef Kristofoletti on Vimeo.

Katie Yurkewicz

1 Comment »

Making magnetic monopoles, and other exotica, in the lab

January 29, 2009 | 2:00 pm

Physicist Shou-Cheng Zhang. Photo: Lauren Schenkman

Physicist Shou-Cheng Zhang. Photo: Lauren Schenkman

Physicist Shou-Cheng Zhang has proposed a way to physically realize the magnetic monopole. In a paper published online in the January 29 issue of Science Express, Zhang and post-doctoral collaborator Xiao-Liang Qi predict the existence of a real-world material that acts as a magic mirror, in which the never-before-observed monopole appears as the image of an ordinary electron. If his prediction is confirmed by experiments, this could mean the opening of condensed matter as a new venue for observing the exotica of high-energy physics.

Zhang is a condensed-matter theorist at the Stanford Institute for Materials and Energy Science (SIMES), a joint institute of SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory and Stanford University. He studies solids that exhibit unusual electromagnetic and quantum behaviors, with an eye towards their use in information storage. But due to his training as a particle physicist, Zhang always keeps the big picture in mind. That’s why it was so easy for him to see that the material he was already working on could behave like what theorists call a magnetic monopole, an isolated north or south magnetic pole.

The monopole is thought of as electric charge’s magnetic cousin, but unlike positive or negative charges, north or south poles always occur together in what’s called a dipole. A lone north or south pole simply doesn’t show up in the real world. Even if you take a bar magnet and cut it in half down the middle, you won’t get a separate north and south pole, but two new dipole magnets instead. For symmetry-minded theorists, however, it’s natural that there should be a magnetic equivalent of charge. String theories and grand unified theories rely on its existence, and its absence undermines the mathematical feng-shui of the otherwise elegant Maxwell’s equations that govern the behavior of electricity and magnetism. What’s more, the existence of a magnetic monopole would explain another mystery of physics: why charge is quantized; that is, why it only seems to come in tidy packets of about 1.602×10–19 coulombs, the charge of an electron or proton.

For decades, scientists have kept their eyes peeled for the elusive monopole, but perhaps they were looking in the wrong place. “They were literally hoping it would fall from sky,” Zhang says. The notion isn’t as far-fetched as it seems—our world is constantly bombarded by weird particles showering from far-off cosmic events, and magnetic monopoles could very well show up as part of that rain. Some enterprising physicists installed loops of superconducting material on their rooftops. If anything remotely like a magnetic monopole fell through, the loops, being sensitive to magnetic fluctuations, would register it.

But in more than 30 years of searching, no one’s been able to conclusively detect this particle. Accelerator experiments have been no more successful, leading scientists believe existing monopoles must be far too heavy to create in even the Large Hadron Collider.

Interestingly, Zhang’s magnetic monopole didn’t fall from the heavens; instead, it was leading a quiet life on the other side of a mirror, but a mirror made of a very special type of alloy. What’s more, says Zhang, the math to prove the effect is very clear. “You could give the last part of the mathematical derivation as a final exam in a junior or senior year undergraduate physics class.”

To understand how a material can act like a magnetic monopole, it helps to examine first how an ordinary metal acts when a charge—an electron, say—is brought close to the surface. Because like charges repel, the electrons at the surface retreat to the interior, leaving the previously neutral surface positively charged. The resulting electric field looks exactly like that of a particle with positive charge the same distance below the surface—it’s the positive mirror image of the electron. In fact, from an observer’s point of view, it’s impossible to tell the difference.

The concept of an image charge is something undergraduate physics students encounter in their very first electricity and magnetism class, along with the idea that the magnetic monopole doesn’t exist. But Zhang’s “mirror” alloy is no ordinary material. It’s what’s called a topological insulator, a strange breed of solid Zhang specializes in, in which “the laws of electrodynamics are dramatically altered,” he says. In fact, if an electron was brought close to the surface of a topological insulator, Zhang’s paper demonstrates, something truly eerie would happen. Instead of an ordinary positive charge, Zhang says, “You would get what looks like a magnetic monopole in the ‘mirror.’”

To go back to the example of image charges, it’s important to emphasize that there isn’t actually half of a bar magnet somewhere inside this material. Instead, Zhang discovered, due to a peculiarity of the material called strong spin-orbit coupling, the nearby electron would induce a current in the surface that circulates constantly without dying out. This in turn—undergraduate physics majors, get out your pencils—would create a magnetic field that looks like that of a magnetic monopole. Experimentalists have tried to approximate this field before, for instance by arranging permanent magnets in certain ways. But to an outside observer, Zhang’s material would be completely indistinguishable from the monopole particle that physicists were hoping to catch in their superconducting detectors.

“We like to find things that don’t exist,” says Zhang. His work on the monopole has further ramifications; this could be a way to physically realize a number of particles that, until now, have only existed as mathematical loopholes in high-energy physics theories. For instance, Zhang has shown that the electron and image monopole together would act like a so-called “anyon” located at the solid’s surface. “The ‘any,’ in this case, is as in ‘anything,’” Zhang explains—they are particles that only exist in two dimensions, whose properties straddle those of the two classes of three-dimensional particles, fermions and bosons.

Although Zhang works as a theorist, he has close ties to experimental physics. In 2007, his prediction of the quantum spin Hall effect in mercury telluride was confirmed experimentally, earning his work praise in Science as a runner-up breakthrough of that year. “As a theorist you’re always motivated by the math, but it’s a testament to our understanding that we can predict real-world materials,” Zhang says. “Before, new materials were more or less found by accident.” Now other SIMES researchers will be using the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource at SLAC to closely study two specific materials, bismuth selenide and bismuth telluride, that Zhang has predicted will exhibit this strange mirror behavior. They hope to confirm the prediction experimentally some time this year.

“Exotic particles such as the magnetic monopole, dyon, anyon, and the axion have played fundamental roles in our theoretical understanding of quantum physics,” Zhang writes in the paper. “Experimental observation of these exotic particles in table-top condensed matter systems could finally reveal their deep mysteries.” Topological insulators could provide a new experimental outlet for high-energy physicists. “You don’t have to look towards the cosmos,” Zhang says. “I think we’ll see more of the beautiful mathematical structures of high-energy physics become realized in condensed matter physics.”

By Lauren Schenkman, symmetry intern

Update: You can hear some discussion of this on the fun This Week in Science podcast.

Guest author

13 Comments »

xkcd vs. The New Yorker

January 28, 2009 | 1:14 pm

For many symmetry readers, it would be an insult to introduce you to xkcd comics. But, we thought we’d point out the cartoon-off between xkcd illustrator Randall Munroe and The New Yorker cartoonist Farley Katz. And, if you missed it, the New York Times featured a story on xkcd last May.

The stick-figure comic strip about life and love in the digital age, from the point of view of the hopelessly scientific, won’t appear in your local funny pages, and tends to go over the heads of folks with no science background (or anyone who hasn’t done software coding in a while). Yet it is precisely this unapologetic commitment to the scientific, computer-centered lifestyle that has earned xkcd hoards of dedicated fans.

Randall Munroes entry in the New Yorker cartoon-off: string theory round

Randall Munroe's entry in The New Yorker cartoon-off: string theory round

For the friendly competition (no winner was actually declared), Munroe didn’t shy away from his usual style or subject matter, and slipped in a fairly obscure physics reference. The cartoon features one of xkcd’s signature stick figures tied up in a string-theory bondage apparatus, which happens to be a tesseract, or a 4-dimensional cube (the tesseract is to the cube as the cube is to the square). Needless to say, most people won’t get that. The comic is still funny without catching the reference, just like the strip “What if,” which is lovely on its own, but is even cooler if you recognize the Apollonian gasket being used. The playful competition also featured an interview with Munroe, revealing his casual approach to the now cult classic.

The complex math, science and computer references in xkcd are obscure, but only to people outside of these fields, and Munroe makes no effort to pander to that audience. It is this complete insider attitude that might make the comic so beloved. The characters don’t wear pocket protectors and glasses; they aren’t all men; they don’t always turn to goop when talking to members of the opposite sex, (in fact, many of the strips are dedicated to romance). The comic doesn’t deny the nerdiness and social awkwardness of the computer-obsessed, but inside the world of xkcd these traits are the norm. People work in laboratories and they do programming in their spare time, and in such a lifestyle, humor arises in unique places. Art reflects life and xkcd is no exception, it’s just a life that many people will never know. About half the time, anyone can understand the comics, and their wit competes with those of The New Yorker. But what may be harder for outsiders to get than the references to computing languages and resistors, is the enthusiasm for raptor attacks and Firefly, and the thought process of a scientist in everyday situations. What outsiders and insiders alike should appreciate is the unique touch that science knowledge adds to a humorous perspective on life (the strips “height”–the poster of which adorns the symmetry editor’s office wall–and “depth” are great examples, as is “cat proximity”).

Share your favorites!

Calla Cofield

4 Comments »

Fermilab code update

January 27, 2009 | 3:35 pm

A mind map of attempts to crack the Fermilab code. Prepared by Psychotria based on the work of many contributors.

A mind map of attempts to crack the Fermilab code. Prepared by Psychotria based on the work of many contributors.

In May 2008, we posted an unusual letter that arrived at Fermilab and asked symmetry readers to help decipher the apparent code. Quick progress revealed a decryption of the first and last sections of the code, but the middle section remains a mystery and the overall meaning is not at all clear.

However, a team of dedicated codebreakers including William Fisher, Matt79, and Psychotria are still working on the code. Between them, they have generated many approaches to deciphering it and have appeared to make progress many times only to have the attempt seem to fall apart without full resolution.

As an aid to keeping track of the progress, Psychotria prepared this mindmap of the various attempts. Perhaps some other codebreakers out there want to join the team and use this a guide to the valiant efforts so far.

David Harris

No Comments »

Groovy beam pipes – an update

January 27, 2009 | 11:00 am

This insert, manufactured by SLAC and the company EMEGA, was placed inside the KEK-B accelerator beam pipe to trap stray electrons with its triangular grooves. (Photo by Mauro Pivi.)

This insert, manufactured by SLAC and the company EMEGA, was placed inside the KEK-B accelerator beam pipe to trap stray electrons with its triangular grooves. (Photo by Mauro Pivi.)

Something unwanted lurks within accelerator beam pipes around the world: stray electrons. This haze of electrons interacts with positron and proton beams, often distorting them. Recent tests carried out at the Japanese accelerator facility KEK, however, confirm that a new insert designed by SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory researchers for the KEK beam pipe can reduce this electron cloud effect.

The tests show that triangular grooves on the beam pipe’s interior surface trap stray electrons, reducing the number of electrons in the cloud by up to a factor of 10. (Read more about the design in “Don’t Rain on My Parade” and more about the fundamental problem in the symmetry feature “Battling the Clouds.”) The test results indicate a significant overall decrease in the number of electrons in the beam pipe. Better yet, the number of electrons detected continued to decrease over the duration of each test, suggesting that the electron cloud will continue to shrink over even longer periods of time.

“The tests went great,” said SLAC researcher Mauro Pivi, who designed the new beam pipe with SLAC’s Lanfa Wang, working with KEK physicists Yusuke Suetsugu and Hitoshi Fukuma. “This is a very good start, and we look forward to even better results as we optimize the design.”

As Pivi notes, this is just the beginning of many rounds of testing. Later this year, slightly modified versions of the grooved beam pipe–this time with smaller grooves and an enhanced coating of titanium nitride to reduce the number of electrons produced–will be sent to KEK, the European accelerator laboratory CERN and the Cornell Electron Storage Ring Test Accelerator to be tested in different magnetic environments.

This story first appeared in SLAC Today on January 27, 2009.

Kelen Tuttle

No Comments »

The fine art of bubble chambers

January 26, 2009 | 6:37 pm

Dormant, by Roshan Houshmand, 20" by 16" oil on canvas

"Dormant"by Roshan Houshmand, 20 by 16 inches, oil on canvas, 2008

In symmetry’s June/July 2007 issue we featured the work of Roshan Houshmand, who was inspired by particle trails left in bubble chambers at Brookhaven National Laboratory and CERN  to create a series of luminous paintings.  The Iranian-American artist said she hadn’t thought much about physics until she attended a lecture by theorist Brian Greene in her small town in upstate New York.

“It was quite a revelation,” Houshmand said.  “One of the most amazing things he talked about was the theory that there are 11 dimensions to reality. Somehow, this statement produced a tremendous feeling of relief in me, and allowed me to redefine my perspectives on life.”

From there, Houshmand launched into a five-month crash course in physics, reading everything from textbooks to Greene’s The Elegant Universe.

Houshmand has posted a number of new paintings on her Web site, along with thoughts about her work and its relationship to physics.

Glennda Chui

2 Comments »

Energy Secretary Steven Chu looks to labs for DOE’s future

January 23, 2009 | 1:51 pm

Secretary of Energy Steven Chu

Secretary of Energy Steven Chu

The Department of Energy’s new leader, Energy Secretary Steven Chu, quite literally wants the organization to help save the world.

“The DOE will have to be the go-to organization for what we face in this country,” Chu said in a satellite broadcast Thursday. “This agency, in my mind, is the key agency for the future of the US.”

Chu’s address to the national laboratories came a day after he was confirmed as the new administration’s energy secretary. In his remarks, Chu focused on the need for new solutions to the problems facing the United States and the world, namely the economic crisis, combating climate change, and finding alternative energy sources. To do this, he said, the country will need to rely on the national laboratories to develop a sound energy policy and to invent and transform new science and technologies that can be brought to the marketplace.

Chu called the science and work of the national laboratories critical and identified them as the “crown jewels the US does not want to lose.” He also commended the national laboratories for the quality of scientists they produced.

“We have a core of truly outstanding scientists,” Chu said, pointing out the numerous Nobel Prize winners associated with national laboratories. “These national labs trained some of the outstanding scientists the country has today.”

Chu, who served for four years as the director of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory prior to his current appointment, said he believes in what DOE has been doing for many years and asked for help in making the DOE the supreme agency in the country.

“DOE is the principal support of physical sciences in the US,” Chu said. “Science in the US is going to have to be the cornerstone of our country in this century.”

Read a Discover magazine blog post about Chu’s remarks

This article first appeared in Fermilab Today on January 23, 2009.

Rhianna Wisniewski

No Comments »

The latest from CERN

January 23, 2009 | 1:29 pm

CERN’s new director-general, Rolf-Dieter Heuer, recently promised a new era of open communication at the laboratory. Heuer revisits the issue of communication in his first column in today’s issue of the CERN Bulletin, a bi-weekly publication for the CERN community.

Today’s Bulletin also includes the first regular update on the status of the Large Hadron Collider.

Katie Yurkewicz

No Comments »