<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The safety of switching on the Large Hadron Collider</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/</link>
	<description>extra dimensions of particle physics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kosmös</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>Kosmös</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>progress for the sake of progress when we can&#039;t even figure out how to get along...what&#039;s the point?

...but if they do make a black hole...it&#039;s a cool way to go out right? You&#039;d have a cool story in the after-life/parallel universe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>progress for the sake of progress when we can&#8217;t even figure out how to get along&#8230;what&#8217;s the point?</p>
<p>&#8230;but if they do make a black hole&#8230;it&#8217;s a cool way to go out right? You&#8217;d have a cool story in the after-life/parallel universe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicko</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-4150</link>
		<dc:creator>nicko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-4150</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry everyone, it&#039;ll be OK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry everyone, it&#8217;ll be OK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-4149</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-4149</guid>
		<description>Katherine: It is precisely because scientists are thinking with the practical parts of their brains that they can say there is no risk. They are not being swayed by irrational fears being stirred up by two or three people, who have done this repeatedly in the past and been proven to have no idea of what is going on every single time.

The point here is that we couldn&#039;t all die. There is no risk. As the abstract of the paper says: &quot;Indeed, conservative arguments based on detailed calculations and the best-available scientific knowledge, including solid astronomical data, conclude, from multiple perspectives, that there is no risk of any significance whatsoever from such black holes.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katherine: It is precisely because scientists are thinking with the practical parts of their brains that they can say there is no risk. They are not being swayed by irrational fears being stirred up by two or three people, who have done this repeatedly in the past and been proven to have no idea of what is going on every single time.</p>
<p>The point here is that we couldn&#8217;t all die. There is no risk. As the abstract of the paper says: &#8220;Indeed, conservative arguments based on detailed calculations and the best-available scientific knowledge, including solid astronomical data, conclude, from multiple perspectives, that there is no risk of any significance whatsoever from such black holes.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katherine</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-4141</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 23:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-4141</guid>
		<description>negligible?!?!?!? seriously? we could all die for godsake. I think this is dumb and there&#039;s no point in it. maybe the LHC should leave the world alone, and not try to kill it off for once? I mean, this is the whole world for love of god! not a town, not a city, not a state, not a country, THE WHOLE WORLD!! that&#039;s like 4.5 billion people. think with the practical part of your brain instead of the nerdy must-prove-we&#039;re-smart part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>negligible?!?!?!? seriously? we could all die for godsake. I think this is dumb and there&#8217;s no point in it. maybe the LHC should leave the world alone, and not try to kill it off for once? I mean, this is the whole world for love of god! not a town, not a city, not a state, not a country, THE WHOLE WORLD!! that&#8217;s like 4.5 billion people. think with the practical part of your brain instead of the nerdy must-prove-we&#8217;re-smart part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>John: I understand what you are saying but the &quot;negligible&quot; risk of getting run over when walking to the shop is a different &quot;negligible&quot; to that of what might happen at the LHC. 

However, the similarity is that in both cases &quot;negligible&quot; means, that it is small enough that we don&#039;t need to adjust our behavior based upon the risk.

The risk of the LHC creating a black hole which destroys the planet is almost identical to the risk of your walking to the shop, creating a black hole, and destroying the planet, relative to the risk of being run over.

I think the idea that over 10,000 scientists, engineers, and technicians (who all contribute to the machine) would follow a &quot;party line&quot; seriously underestimates the regard scientists have for their own lives and the lives of their families, and also the degree to which this group think in unison. Scientists in a group are some of the most argumentative, contrary people you can collect because the nature of science is that scientists argue against each other to test ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: I understand what you are saying but the &#8220;negligible&#8221; risk of getting run over when walking to the shop is a different &#8220;negligible&#8221; to that of what might happen at the LHC. </p>
<p>However, the similarity is that in both cases &#8220;negligible&#8221; means, that it is small enough that we don&#8217;t need to adjust our behavior based upon the risk.</p>
<p>The risk of the LHC creating a black hole which destroys the planet is almost identical to the risk of your walking to the shop, creating a black hole, and destroying the planet, relative to the risk of being run over.</p>
<p>I think the idea that over 10,000 scientists, engineers, and technicians (who all contribute to the machine) would follow a &#8220;party line&#8221; seriously underestimates the regard scientists have for their own lives and the lives of their families, and also the degree to which this group think in unison. Scientists in a group are some of the most argumentative, contrary people you can collect because the nature of science is that scientists argue against each other to test ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: symmetry breaking &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New LHC safety report</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-4081</link>
		<dc:creator>symmetry breaking &#187; Blog Archive &#187; New LHC safety report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-4081</guid>
		<description>[...] and found that collisions present no danger. We have written previously about the safety of the LHC here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and found that collisions present no danger. We have written previously about the safety of the LHC here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Cotterell</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-4007</link>
		<dc:creator>John Cotterell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 15:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-4007</guid>
		<description>So... leaving the lights on, driving petrol-driven cars and drinking water out of plastic bottles will destroy the planet, but switching on a hadron collider won&#039;t?

Interesting that the people at CERN think that any risk of destroying the planet can be regarded as &quot;negligible&quot;

There&#039;s a negligible risk of getting run over if I walk to the shop.

Now.. if someone told me that walking to the shop incurred a &quot;negligible&quot; risk of creating a black hole and destroying the planet. I&#039;d rethink my options.

However, if I was then told that €6.3bn had been spent enabling me to walk to the shop, and that my head would roll if I didn&#039;t go, then I&#039;d forget about armageddon and do as I was told.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; leaving the lights on, driving petrol-driven cars and drinking water out of plastic bottles will destroy the planet, but switching on a hadron collider won&#8217;t?</p>
<p>Interesting that the people at CERN think that any risk of destroying the planet can be regarded as &#8220;negligible&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a negligible risk of getting run over if I walk to the shop.</p>
<p>Now.. if someone told me that walking to the shop incurred a &#8220;negligible&#8221; risk of creating a black hole and destroying the planet. I&#8217;d rethink my options.</p>
<p>However, if I was then told that €6.3bn had been spent enabling me to walk to the shop, and that my head would roll if I didn&#8217;t go, then I&#8217;d forget about armageddon and do as I was told.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-3642</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-3642</guid>
		<description>Black holes just keep getting bigger, I know I made one in a baby food jar. Sure at first it ate one atom at a time, then it got too big for the baby food jar and Had to put it into a pickle jar. And I assure you it was eating more then one atom at a time, because I had to put it into a fifty gallon aquarium in half the the time it took to go from the baby jar to pickle jar. Long story short my parents said I could not keep it any longer, so I released it into the wild. Now I&#039;m sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Black holes just keep getting bigger, I know I made one in a baby food jar. Sure at first it ate one atom at a time, then it got too big for the baby food jar and Had to put it into a pickle jar. And I assure you it was eating more then one atom at a time, because I had to put it into a fifty gallon aquarium in half the the time it took to go from the baby jar to pickle jar. Long story short my parents said I could not keep it any longer, so I released it into the wild. Now I&#8217;m sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur Dent</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-3602</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur Dent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 23:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-3602</guid>
		<description>So this is it. We&#039;re going to die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this is it. We&#8217;re going to die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Wertmuller</title>
		<link>http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/2008/08/20/the-safety-of-switching-on-the-large-hadron-collider/comment-page-1/#comment-3522</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Wertmuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/breaking/?p=652#comment-3522</guid>
		<description>Peskin&#039;s article is excellent but has an unsettling closer: &quot;in order to justify accelerators of the future [over 100TeV] we will need to better engage the public...&quot;  So physicists have already determined the safety of future accelerators?  And the public only needs to be &quot;engaged&quot;?  No hubris among physicists.  No need for thought about &quot;constructionism&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peskin&#8217;s article is excellent but has an unsettling closer: &#8220;in order to justify accelerators of the future [over 100TeV] we will need to better engage the public&#8230;&#8221;  So physicists have already determined the safety of future accelerators?  And the public only needs to be &#8220;engaged&#8221;?  No hubris among physicists.  No need for thought about &#8220;constructionism&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

